this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2591 readers
275 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh cool, we're doing 2020 but blue.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pointing out super suspicious things about the election is not comparable to denying the results with literally no evidence

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're just using a misleading source to push a supposition. So much better. Next tell me that you're 'just asking questions' about the election.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Why do you want so badly to let trump get away with cheating? Do you genuinely trust that he won the election fair and square when he straight up tried bribing governors to win the last election? There's more than enough evidence to warrant an investigation, so why oppose it?

[–] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Do the voting machines even have the hardware to connect to the internet? Also if the software was modified it should be possible to pull an image from a compromised machine to compare it to the official version of the software.

I don't see any evidence being presented here, just theories of how fraud could have happened which is the same way I felt when people cried foul in 2020. Theories without evidence.

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

"misleading" but still way more bullet ballots than there should be. Most of this is admittedly a hypothesis on what exactly the data means/how it happened, but that data can't be ignored just bc he was slightly off