this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1255 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 13 points 52 minutes ago

This kind of shit should not be tolerated.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 21 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Advertising targeted towards minors needs to be banned.

[–] veggibles@lemmy.wtf 18 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Advertising ~~targeted towards minors~~ needs to be banned.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world -1 points 51 minutes ago (2 children)

Advertising itself isn't a bad thing.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 9 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

No, it's.. it's pretty bad.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 35 minutes ago (1 children)

Some level of advertising is a necessary evil when you're in a capitalist system because otherwise people have no way to get their products out ti the market. There's a balance to be struck.

Hell even in other systems advertising is still important for finding out about cool new things even if money no longer exists

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 31 minutes ago

If money doesn't exist how do you pay for the ads?

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 3 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

They can put up signs inside their business windows. That's plenty. Everything is a blight.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

It's not 1950 anymore.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The book os very good. Reading it now. The writer starts off with a great stoty about a shark attack.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

Did he choose electrocution over the shark attack?

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Centralized social media is an advertisement platform that targets advertisements according to information & conduct users feed the platform, and some of those users are teenagers?

They're advertising cosmetics to teenagers unlike ever before in the history of teen-centric media?

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago

lol, Jesus. It is like what a screen writer would come up with for a movie that contained a terrible company run by terrible people doing stuff so outlandishly terrible everyone watching would think "the absurdity of the terrible is how you know it is made up".

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 6 hours ago

can't believe a social network started by incels in college to rate girls sexually would do something like this.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 45 points 7 hours ago

Facebook... now even more toxic than previously known!

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 74 points 8 hours ago

That's 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It's in its sorce code

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

even a scathing rant about surveillance capitalism becomes fodder for the machine, as you can clearly see with the ads on this page. 

Ads? I can see no ads...

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 66 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

TIL teen girls still used Facebook.

[–] guywithoutaname@lemm.ee 55 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Instagram too according to the article.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I get Instagram (lots of creative types there), Facebook is a bit surprising though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago

Goddam I had to read that headline 3 times before I understood the implication!
That is outright disgusting, and such practices ought to be outlawed.
Or as Trump would say, very cool and very legal way to make money.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 59 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Happy I got AdNauseam after uBlock Origin. Deleted my facebook a year ago, shit is an AI slopfest built upon the greed and manipulation of every part of the chain. Defcon 31 has a good talk that brings this up. "Disenshittify or die" by Cory Doctrow, cann recommend to watch.

What's AdNauseam?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I support the use of AdNauseam. Not sure if there are any more extreme alternatives, I now choose to be actively hostile towards advertising/tracking rather than just passively blocking it.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

My dad has been talking about wanting something like AdNauseam for years, i was very happy when i found it. The extra mile would probably be to expand it with a VPN and constantly spam clicks, clear cache, switch IP and obfuscate data. Now we just wait for someone with enough time to build it...

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 81 points 14 hours ago (17 children)

Teenagers should not be on social media. I rest my case.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I hearby petition an amendment for an expansion of the child protective laws to widen the definition of abuse, neglect, and reckless abandonment of children to include:

"letting children browse without ad blockers"

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 6 hours ago

Humans should not be on social media.

Fixed.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They shouldn't, but also PSA to any parents but modern parenting advice typically is to let your kids use social media if they choose, and guide them through the social and emotional difficulties with good communication. Don't blanket ban it because they'll just use it anyways without guidance, and be unprepared the moment they turn 18.

It's a case of: 99.9% of kids are smoking cigarettes so yours will too. Better to show them how to use a weekly cigar without inhaling, than just ban it which won't work.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 41 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not just teenagers. Facebook and quite a few others should outright be banned. Not only they are scientifically proven to be a mental health catastrophe and a political threat to democracy, it's also pretty clear now that both these things are part of their design, not bugs or unintended emerging properties.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 8 points 8 hours ago

Facebook actively contributed to the genocide in Myanmar, and did basically nothing about it because they didnt want to hire more moderators that spoke the language, so that they could adequately remove pro-genocidal content

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

That's sounds like blaming teens for the actions of the adults behind Facebook.

[–] vegetvs@kbin.earth 21 points 8 hours ago

That's a fallacy. Teenagers are the victims here. So I'm obviously blaming greedy corporations, lack of good parenting and proper regulation from authorities.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 307 points 18 hours ago (18 children)

At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›