this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
200 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47817 readers
1064 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Especially as a human can normally consent to death but a pet can't

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Canada has m.a.i.d.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

keeping sick people alive is a lot of profit.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago

Easy. Religious people who think humans are superior to any other life. This leads to killing animals for both merciful and vicious reasons. It also leads to keeping people alive by any Frankensteinian method possible while denying any death because "going to God" without enough suffering first isn't religious enough. Although big corporations also get the right to kill people (gun manufacturers, oil & gas industry, Sackler family, etc.) so long as they profit enough off the deaths.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The US just pretends to be against it due to puritanical traditions. In reality we keep guns legal so people can blow their own brains out when they get fucked by late stage capitalism. Suicide is the majority vs murder when it comes to gun deaths.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Do you have any idea how much money there is in end of life care, nursing homes, and hospice? Its a many billion dollar industry. It exists mostly to rob estates from the elderly so the kids inherit nothing. Its a truly evil thing to prolong someones suffering in order to pad your bank account.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago

Canada has Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID). People can - with medical approval and assistance - choose to go out on their own terms.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I wish we could do for our human loved ones the same as we can do for our pets.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Because while euthanasia is generally a good thing, there are also big potentials for abuse and unnecessary tragedy. We maintain a pretense of caring about these things with humans and so most governments err on the side of caution while others think they're such hot shit they can dance their way through the quagmire. Meanwhile, we openly don't give a single fuck what happens to non-human animals, and our culture is predicated on treating them like objects, so you're allowed to do whatever you want with them. Kill them because they're suffering, kill them because they bark too loud, it's all the same. It's your dog-shaped object, go nuts.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

animal abuse is a crime you cant just do whatever you want

[–] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

in islam we are only allowed to kill animals in self defence or for food euthanasia is forbidened in islam

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You have noticed that there is a difference between humans and pets, haven't you?

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This comment provides no value to this discussion. If you want to contribute, you should explain the big deciding difference and not just expect everyone to magically know the point you are trying to make.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

It is certainly open to interpretation.

One could say "yes, they are different because humans can explicitly state when they are ready to go." I don't think that was the point they were aiming for though.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because pets aren't leaving anyone large sums of cash in their will.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 21 hours ago

Surely some of the pets of eccentric millionaires have money left to them that will go to someone else when they die. 🤔

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

We live in a hierarchy of sentience. Where an animals' lives have less value then a humans.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because most of the members of the society (people) belive that people have souls and animals don't.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

because of WW2 and the experiences made there.

if euthanasia was legal, it would be immediately used against some kind of disadvantaged group, which is why it's kept forbidden.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Euthanasia is already legal in some countries.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And there are already some controversy around disadvantaged groups getting suggested applying for euthanasia, some even going through it.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Source?

In my country euthanasia has to be required by the person wanting to ending. Nor the government nor any other person or organization can ask for this procedure to be done to an unwilling person.

The person has to require twice, and be evaluated by a comitee of medical doctors to ensure that it has a chronic disease that could not be cured and that it's causing ongoing pain that would not get better with medication.

https://www.sanidad.gob.es/gabinete/notasPrensa.do?id=6823

Statistics on it doesn't point to it being "targeted to anyone". More so, there are many people who ask for it and cannot get it in time and die of natural causes before the procedure could be done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would those disadvantaged groups agree to being euthanized?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This document says they did.

I'm pro-euthanization but if we're going to get into a consent in fascist countries debate then I think it's not very hard to fake.

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is actually legal in Canada, you have the right to kill yourself there

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Technically, if you're successful, you have the right to kill yourself anywhere. Don't let your dreams be dreams. I'd absolutely pull the plug on myself if the time came where I just wanted to fuck off. Hard to arrest and take a corpse to trial.

[–] allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem is by the time you're bad enough to say "fuck this" you may not be physically able to pull the plug. My dad had terminal cancer. One day he thought he was just tired and went up to take a nap. He laid down and never sat up again. He died a week and a half later. Unfortunately for my dad my state didn't allow for terminal patients the choice to end their life. As of this year it is allowed if you have a doctor saying you have less than 6 months to live.

[–] DaniNatrix@leminal.space 2 points 13 hours ago

Same with my mom and cancer. One Saturday she took a long nap and missed a pain medication dose, as my dad thought she'd be better off getting the rest. Never got back up unassisted and was gone within 10 days. She never would have opted for euthanasia anyway, super Catholic, but it was crazy how fast, and then how slowly, the whole thing unfolded.

I have multiple plans in place for myself if I end up facing down the same fate. Religion wasn't catching for me so if I get a terminal diagnosis, I'm living it up and then Irish goodbying. Really sorry about your dad.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Sorry to for your loss buddy :(

load more comments
view more: next ›