this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
555 points (99.3% liked)

Comic Strips

23521 readers
1773 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

This is amazon, google, etc. A change is needed

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is missing the crucial evil step of "buy out competition to monopolize the concept"

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I honestly understand the way part of this cycle goes - but I always felt it could be prevented with easy “abandon to competitor” paths.

Like, Xbox tried this with Game Pass. People warned that it would just get more expensive, and y’know what? I ignored them. It was a valid option, because as soon as they did increase prices, I just stopped paying them and took my gaming elsewhere to indie games. People with this playbook choke when they realize they’re in an industry with real competition.

Of course, many other industries like social networks no longer have that safety net preventing the full enshittification cycle. That’s in part due to regulators handing over the whole hog for 5 cents worth of lobbying bribes, to the point we have MANDATORY OS-LEVEL DATA COLLECTION being openly pushed by legislators.

[–] h_ramus@piefed.social 10 points 16 hours ago

Ads and jacking up prices. Netflix anyone?

[–] Upperhand@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

In all honesty, as soon as you start seeing the signs of step two, drop whatever service it is. If enough people actually practiced what they preached; talking with your wallet and for the model that just requires views or clicks did it, things would actually change.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 38 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ads? What ads? I see no ads whatsoever.

Yes, that includes on my phone. :)

[–] TheseusNow@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Another panel: And we will hide an opt out of selling personal info and using their data to train our AI options. And if they have an ad blocker we will make the option completely disapear and blame their ad blocker for hiding it.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Same. "But that's too hard!" is what I hear most.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Ive never heard that. People always just ignore when I ask or point it out, or agree they need to fix it.

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 13 points 20 hours ago

100% straight out of Cory Doctorow's book, Enshittification.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

If he was saying in the last panel "I'm a victim of class warfare" the cartoon would be perfect.

[–] morto@piefed.social 8 points 22 hours ago

What I dislike in this concept is the idea of corporations being good in the beginning. They never were. Most big tech services come from the very beginning with clear threats to many things if they rise to become a monopoly, but people turn a blind eye to it and dismiss anyone talking about. Then, years later, they get like "oh no, the corporations are becoming enshittified!"

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Ah... YouTube

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

be hated

They aren't hated. They have billions of users (and tens of billions of bot accounts) all rattling around trying to run this same influence model from within the various platforms.

In so far as everyone complains about everything constantly, they are a source of perpetual complaints. But the idea that people can spend hours of their lives on YouTube and then claim "I hate this"... No you don't. You obviously don't hate it. You love it. You love your slop.

[–] railway692@piefed.zip 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You've obviously never been an addict.

You can absolutely hate a thing you're using and feel like quitting isn't possible.

We could say that "hate" isn't a complete accounting of the feelings in a complex situation, maybe.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You’ve obviously never been an addict.

Obviously.

You can absolutely hate a thing you’re using and feel like quitting isn’t possible.

I've been told I'm not an addict. I've been told social media is addictive. I've been told I'm on social media. I'm rattling around the contradictions.

Addicts can also love the thing and not feel like quitting, because the thing they're addicted to gives them a feeling of empowerment or a release from anxiety.

Social media fulfills a craving for socializing that humans naturally desire. It offers to fulfill this natural desire through a low-cost, easy-access interface. And it feeds this craving continuously, often artificially through synthetic interactions with no real counterparty. And it does so with the goal of influencing the audience's understanding of the world and consumption habits, two things humans also natively seek.

Talking about social media like an addiction misses the core drive towards its adoptions and proliferation. You might as well say you're addicted to food and air as to say you're addicted to text and video. These are sensory stimulations everyone is always pining for, whether or not a phone screen is the delivery mechanism.

The challenge people face isn't the social media, it is the absence of non-social media as an alternative. We're caged animals looking out the window and you're complaining about "window addiction".

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I’ve been told I’m not an addict. I’ve been told social media is addictive. I’ve been told I’m on social media. I’m rattling around the contradictions.

There is no contradiction here: You can use something addictive without getting addicted. Ref. all the non-alcoholics that regularly consume alcohol, all the mountain climbers that aren't adrenaline junkies, and all the foodies that aren't obese sugar addicts.

Addicts can also love the thing and not feel like quitting (...)

Nobody said otherwise. What was said is that addicts can hate the thing they're addicted to, and still be unable to quit. It's the fact that you find yourself unable to quit even if you want to that indicates you're addicted, not whether you actually want to quit.

You might as well say you’re addicted to food and air as to say you’re addicted to text and video.

False equivalence. Things necessary to sustain yourself are never referred to as addiction. Sure, you can be addicted to these things, but that implies you're consuming them excessively (beyond what is needed for healthy sustenance).

But the idea that people can spend hours of their lives on YouTube and then claim “I hate this”… No you don’t. You obviously don’t hate it. You love it. You love your slop.

The whole point here is that there is no direct implication from using something and liking to use it, the reason being that addicts quite commonly dislike the thing they're addicted to, yet continue using it.