Issue 2: employees were able to manually find and view footage from smart glasses
Issue 1: meta exists
At least that’s where I’m at.
this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
293 points (96.8% liked)
Technology
84354 readers
4290 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Issue 3: People are stupid enough to wear INTERNET CONNECTED GLASSES while having sex.
Makes you wonder what your phones sees / hears every day.
Probably a lot of post-nut clarity face
Most likely the glasses were places on a nightstand or something. They mentioned this in another article. People would place the glasses somewhere thinking they are not recording and undress for example. They would also go into changing rooms while wearing glasses but that's understandable.
I doubt this is always or even often the case, though. Your glasses would have to be somehow pointed directly at you on your bed. Most people would fold them up and set them facing up or in a case.
Fair but no one said the recording where some good quality porn with proper angles and everything. It's possible they just caught a glimpse of someone having sex.
Unless someone deliberately set them up in a good spot from which to record the sexual encounter.
Yeah could be either consensual or non-consensual, too. Some creep recording their sexual exploits without informing the partner.
Perhaps they didn't wear them, the user thought the glasses were off and not recording.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That was my thought. Who the hell wears glasses while they fuck? I mean, did they WANT to record it?
I can't imagine being all nekkid and shit, shaggin someone and wearing those fucking moronic glasses. Those stupid things are a leading cause of vaginal dryness.
What's more surprising is people are getting laid wearing those big ass dork frames
I would assume they were placed on a bedside table pointed in the general direction of the fucking.
But still.
load more comments
(3 replies)
destroy the surveillance plague now.
Meta contractors were tasked with viewing peoples glasses video, where the wearers did not appear to know they were being recorded. "For quality purposes". Including using the bathroom. So everytime a glasses user goes to the bathroom, a kenyan could be watching? Every time they enter their online banking credentials, a kenyan could be noting them down? Good god.
Obviously not. That contractor is blown. On to Myanmar!
Oh no, not a kenyan :0
I don’t understand why the outsourcing firm was punished. As far as I can tell, a thousand people are losing their jobs for no reason. This wasn’t their fault, and I don’t see what problem is being solved here. It makes absolutely no sense.
Meta punishing whistleblowers for doing what Meta hired them to do.
“We hired them to watch everything, and are shocked outraged to hear that includes intimate videos of our users.”
Ah. I didn’t realize that Meta considered them “whistleblowers”. It’s still a shitty thing to do, but shitty is what corporations excel at.
It's not difficult to understand really. These underpaid slaves failed their task by having morals and complaining too much so they're off to find other slaves that keep quiet..
These concerns were first reported in February 2026, when journalists in Sweden and Kenya spoke to Sama employees. Workers said they had seen videos that appeared to show people in private situations, and in some cases, they believed users may not have realised they were being recorded at the time.
Talking to the media is a big problem.
How dare someone see sex
Can we please not use the International Business Times? I promise I'll have a prebaked explanation someday, but until then, here's the Ars Technica article this sewage drain of an outlet is using as its lone source.
Is it just me or is Lemmy being flooded with bottom of the barrel journalism? This is an issue in so many communities that I‘m starting to think it‘s just a few people with multiple accounts pushing an agenda of slop. And people eat it up almost every time.
It’s not just Lemmy. The whole world is being flooded by ever increasing quantities of shit, and filtering through it efficiently is decreasingly easy.
pushing an agenda of slop
I tend to assume "don't know better, and moderative action for gatekeeping quality on Lemmy is sparse and delayed". Sometimes we just get Reddit's backwash because that's what's easiest, and Redditors are not discerning either.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
Take the god damn glasses off!
Probably intentional, they wanted pov video
google glasses 2.0 basically. anything that allows almost private use of the internet in public places without anyone able to see what you are browsing always lead to porn/sexual activities.
the private way to use internet is vpns, https, dns over https, decentralized services and not a security camera on your head
Ban Ray-Bans, maybe. 😏
If I'm not casing a casino, I don't need spy glasses.
Must be durable glasses at least.
This one is the joke I was looking for :)
I would have thought they would have needed something bigger to have sex on
view more: next ›