this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
707 points (98.8% liked)

Open Source

47579 readers
91 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its always good to try!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thomasshikari@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago (4 children)

A Fairphone with GrapheneOS would be the tops

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

GrapheneOS doesn't like Fairphone very much it seems...

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what led you to this conclusion?

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the graphene people never fail to stir pot. lol

they not wrong, but there's better ways to inform other people.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Isn't /e/os (murena) a seperate company from fairphone?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GrapheOS doesn't like anyone. I don't even think they should be treated as part of open phone community. They are hostile to everything that they didn't make.

[–] nebulahhh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are hostile to those who dont genuinely care about privacy and security like fairphone and murena who also spend time spreading hate and disinformation about grapheneos and the devs and owner

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viov@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Sure would be the toppiest of tops!

We can encourage them to work together in their official communication channels too!

Would be good for both of them on every level. GrapheneOS learning to make their own phones, and Fairphone learning to make an OS while both being partnered

Edit: Be the change you want to see everybody!! Flood the gates with what we want!

[–] illi@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Afaik Fairphone is not interested in implementing some security features that GrapheneOS people consider a deal breaker

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 71 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It 👏 should 👏 be 👏 the 👏 law 👏 .

I don't know how they managed to sneak locking a system to a single boot loader. And what about Qualcomm chips? They have a hypervisor OS, you say? A small operating system that can read all your memory? Updated as firmware?

Great, forcibly open source that system as well and tell them once and for all that they can fuck off. No, you don't get to control another persons property - you disgusting goblin.

Either that, or ban the sale of such devices permanently across Europe.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That too! I covered that in another of my recent posts on the Europe community on here

That is a big thing Europe can at least make happen and in Asian/African/Latin countries too.

I like your addition though that is all facts!! Let's keep pushing countries to make that happen.

To make them undo what Google is trying to do currently and what Apple does for long time to have all those devices be fully changeable for the OS

Needs to become a movement everywhere!!! Just as StooKillingGames, and the KeepAndroidOpen movements

We need a catchy name for it

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Hardware should be software agnostic

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 10 points 1 month ago

Exactly. This was less important before the internet got ubiquitous, but nowadays, when manufacturers can screw you remotely, it's very important.

This kind of vertical integration, where a single entity controls both hardware and software shouldn't exist.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fairphone? perhaps. Samsung? hell naw. Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.
But I do hope hope that Fairphone begins to embrace Linux support.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.

They go out of their way to ensure that it cannot be disabled even if you do care about the spyware and try to uninstall or disable it.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Per GOS: Samsung has almost all hardware requirements to support GOS except... they purposely cripple their device upon installation of a third party OS. One can only suspect they indeed make money with their spyware stack!

[–] viov@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What is the bottleneck holding Fairphone back from supporting Linux fully?

[–] dabu@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] parson0@startrek.website 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And I encourage everyone to write to banks and other service providers to provide apks directly or through F-Droid

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We might be able to get them to provide APKs with some luck and finesse, but I unfortunately don't see them publishing to F-Droid. F-Droid actually builds your APK from source themselves, and I don't see banks giving up the source any time soon.

Actually, as I'm thinking about it, that may be true for F-Droid's main repo, but I know other repos exist, so maybe they could host their own that you would just add to your F-Droid's repo list?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The idea that the Major Software Enshittificator which is Samsung would ever go along with this is incredibly naive.

Samsung was one of the first to fill their smartphones and tables with tons of useless "Samsung" software that can't be removed by normal means, and even people who had their older and less insanely stuffed with junk devices got them forcefully filled with that crap via updates (making their older devices unusable, "incentivizing" them to get new ones).

Samsung hasn't been consumer friendly for at least a decade.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rod_Orm@piefed.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish we have more choice for linux phone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

I remember the GrapheneOS team saying that they won't bring their OS to Fairphone, because the Fairphones don't bring hardware support for security measures the GrapheneOS team doesn't want to compromise on.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fairphone should focus on helping the Linux options move along, no need waste resources on GOS, just another android ROM

Long term android should die off in place of Linux but its a long road

Have UT running on a Nord phone, they have made good strides over the years, appreciate their dedication

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] furtiveParalysis@jlai.lu 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Fairphone and samsung are absolutely not the same kind. I want to point fairphone is officially distributing /e/OS which is a niche of 2-3 brands. This company that is nowhere in size close to samsung also engages hardcore in device repairability making its phones be a flagship. If anything just let them be successful and tempt others to follow their lead. I would love graphene os to be better supported but just don't put all the strain on the one doing good. (I type this from my FP6 /e/OS)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Both tantalizingly close with respect to GrapheneOS. I wouldn't expect Samsung to ever support the other two, but their phones are supposed to have every security element GOS expects. Only problem is that Samsung wants to make their own walled-garden ecosystem a la Apple.

I do remember reading somewhere that GrapheneOS are open to someone making a GSI (generic system image) port that would work with phones like Fairphone, which GOS don't want to officially support due to a lack of security features. I wonder if anyone has started work on such a thing.

[–] anon5621@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Samsung? They will not give a shit it huge corp

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mio@feddit.nu 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be nice to buy a phone that officially support GrapheneOS. I dont want to thinker with phones. I can image it is going to be the same experience as going from Windows to Linux. Things would actually work in a good way as a user wants to instead of locked down requirements.

[–] unbuckled_easily933@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

GrapheneOS has partnered with Motorola and were supposed to see phones that come with GOS sometime in 2027

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I have a newer Pixel phone and I'm comfortable installing and running custom ROMs from doing so regularly back in the day - for those who've daily driven both, what are the reasons I should NOT switch from the stock OS to GrapheneOS?

[–] dafta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

You can't use Google Wallet to pay with NFC, they don't have Miracast, and Chromecast can supposedly work but I haven't been able to get it to work. Those are the three major hurdles I've found, but getting away from Google was a priority so I'll live without them.

NFC can have other providers other than Google Wallet, but I haven't found any that I find trustworthy enough yet. Supposedly the EU is making an alternative.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

OEM's

Or just OEMs, even.

[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Ya. Short term Motorola for Graphene, long term any that support postmarketos

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The short term is forked android. The long term is a Linux distribution, new or otherwise. It doesn't seem reasonable to assume that the proprietary blobs in Android will get reverse engineered.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] razen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How come Linux worked on desktop but on phones it is having such a hard time even tho Android has the linux kernel( i think).

Is PC hardware more open and known to everyone about everything while mobile dosent? And if that is the case then why arent phone opening itself for support?

[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because ARM is a fucking mess. Each device has it's own way of booting. There's no standard like UEFI or BIOS.

Plus you need propreitary code for modem to support 2G, 3G, 4G....etc. which are complicated to implement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Fairphone has their own with /e/OS

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›