this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
300 points (98.1% liked)

World News

46574 readers
2765 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lodging facility in Kyoto has drawn a protest from the Israeli Embassy in Tokyo for asking an Israeli man to sign a pledge that he had never been involved in war crimes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 hours ago

Japan: "did you commit war crimes?"
Israel: "i'm outraged"
Japan:"that isn't a 'no'..."

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If being asked to confirm that you have not committed war crimes makes you uncomfortable, then you might be a war criminal.

I'm pretty sure Japan's immigration asks if you've ever been convicted of a crime, so how is this any different?

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

It's different because no jury in Israel will convict someone of warcrimes (against Palestinians).

No conviction, no crime. EZ.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago

If israel doesn't like this treatment then they should stop the policy of forcing israeli citizens to serve in the israel genocide forces.

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 56 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Classic Japanese. No dancing around or confusion about anti-semitism, just straight out asking the Israeli about recent war crimes.

Had the same as a Swiss guy living there: sure, everybody loves Roger Federer, but they also know about Nazi gold and the banking secret protecting dictatorships. And they just ask about it directly. Would never happen on Japanese topics though.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 1 day ago (24 children)

This right here is what I love about Japan.

When I was there a few years ago to snowboard, they had a "fuck you" policy to non-Japanese speakers in some towns because the Aussies basically run around rough shod and turn everything into a loud party.

Imagine being in a sleepy resort town while 7 dudes are walking down your cobbled street screaming about Ruggers, then one falls into the cold stream because they're drunk, so a rescue team is sent out... On a weekly basis.

There's simply a no more bullshit cap.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

As an Australian, what the fuck is a ruggers?

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

It's the bog standard for saying rugby. Don't get yer daks tied up, not trying to get you mad as a cut snake. Ruggers is exy, mate.

Of course everything I'm saying might be furphy.

[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

That's how English aristocrats (and aristocrat wannabes) say rugby. Whether that's what they mean I dunno though

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 46 minutes ago

Too right. Pip pip, cheerio!

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago (12 children)

So, to be clear, you get how that's more than a little bit fucked up, right?

To demonstrate, imagine a deep southern U.S town instituting an English-only policy and aggressively turning away for example Spanish or Arabic-speakers.

This is not something to be celebrated. Ban the thing you actually want to prevent instead of pushing through unmitigated xenophobia.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

imagine a deep southern U.S town instituting an English-only policy and aggressively turning away for example Spanish or Arabic-speakers.

Yeah that's called Tuesday in the rural south.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm not saying it's the right thing to do but a big difference here is that up until VERY recently, the US did not have an official language, so for them to say "English only" would be a bit more offensive than for Japan (whose official language is Japanese) to say "japanese only".

Additionally, the US is on colonized land, so English wouldn't be the native language of the land. Japan on the other hand has existed for close to 40,000 years and was not colonized in the same way (Not saying that the Japanese historically haven't been colonizers, but the island of Japan is generally not). I genuinely wouldn't even be mad about it if someone in Manitoba made a rule that was like "Ojibwe only".

But also to your point, yeah the US did recently pick an official language AND launch an "English only" campaign for a whole profession and it is extremely fucked up.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 23 hours ago

Yes, I do. But I am a foreigner there. When we don't observe their traditions and disrupt their society, I feel like it's okay for them to set boundaries.

I get why it's not right, but I also accept it. It's not my country, not my rules, not my traditions. So, I am willing to live by their rules.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 55 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Wait, so Israel is not even trying to distance itself from war crimes... Their actual point is "not all war crimes are equal and it's difamatory to label everyone who commits war crimes with the same 'war criminal' label"... Wtf is wrong with those people.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

Its what the free market wants ;)

load more comments
view more: next ›