this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
308 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
4293 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

The CEO reports to the board, which reports to the shareholders. This is how it always is. His goal is basically pointless - even if the board did create a policy, or a charter or whatever, it could be revoked just as easily.

If you want to be calling the shots in a way that you can't be fired, you have to become the majority shareholder. Like he did with Twitter. But then your customers can still leave. I'm sure that's why he's trying for those hefty govt contracts that can't be terminated so easily.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want total control you need to take 100% of the risk. If you want to use other peoples money then you are gonna have a board. Typical elon wants to have his cake and eat it too.

Nah. Only 51% of the risk.

[–] gil2455526@lemmy.eco.br 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I remember a rumor SpaceX actually employs handlers to distract Elon to keep him off causing problems.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

I have a friend that works at SpaceX, and he's told me that every time Elon is there it's a bad day.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

Seems like they could solve this a lot more permanently by luring him into some kind of industrial accident.

I heard there was a team that followed afterwards and corrected the things he meddled with

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

All these dictators and authoritarians want to die on the throne.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 19 hours ago

But luckily some of them die while running away on the mountains and they end up hanged upside down to the roof of a fuel pump in Milan.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The article doesn't say what happens if his mental state worsens. Humans do get sick.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or if he develops a crippling depenance on ketamine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If e-lawn had a massive coronary and died, the world would still go on.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

His companies would probably do better too.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They would stop taking absurd risks for sure, which would result in lower rewards but overall a bit better still. No more industry-changing projects though.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago

We actually don't know if that would happen. for all we know they could replace him with RFK Jr and take 10x more risk than elon, which would mean even bigger rewards !!!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which ones? The electric cars her hasn't improved on for 10 years, the drilling machine that nobody uses, the flamethrower, the social media company he murdered, it the government divisions he burned to ground? So innovative.

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Starlink, rockets that operate like airliners, and there just might eventually come something out of neuralink and FSD some day. Also, how many companies in the US aims to build humanoid robots at scale? To me it looks like in many fields the situation is China vs elon, unfortunately.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Neuralink I suppose is an example where his appetite for crazy risk might pay off or be terrible.

FSD implies no one else is trying for self driving, and that's no shortage there for that ambition.

Humanoid robots at scale, they haven't displayed a capability to suggest they have any better shot than others, and there's plenty of less loud companies trying. None are particularly close, so Elon stands relatively alone in proclaiming success without the proof.

I don't know that his crazy appetite for risk is on display with SpaceX. I would argue most of their real successes were relatively lower risk, and generally when the companies indulge musk at his craziest are like the other comment says, comparative failures.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 105 points 2 days ago (4 children)

So if he died of a heart attack, SpaceX would just implode?

LMAO

Elon Musk is expendable. Punting him would likely improve all important metrics at SpaceX.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Punting him would likely improve all important metrics at SpaceX.

And Tesla.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~>and solar system~~

On second thought that dipshit ain't going interplanetary, even if Mars was made of cocaine.

He might crash something on the Moon at some point.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It wouldn't implode because it's not like his shares just disappear on death. Whoever obtained those shares would have the 10x voting power over the company. So whoever ended up with those shares have full control over SpaceX.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Strap him to the outside of the next rocket they launch.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was trying to say it more cleverly, but I've got nothing: can we just put him under it?

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That would be the preferred method of firing him.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's nothing low and slow about cooking something under the main thrusters of a rocket capable of escaping earth's gravity...

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 1 day ago

"250 for 8 hours?! I don't have time for that. Let's just do 15,000 for 2 seconds."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 128 points 2 days ago

He lies to the board just like he lies to everyone else, fascists don't use language to convey meaning or share information, they use it as a weapon to manipulate and intimidate.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 59 points 2 days ago (5 children)

secret knowledge previously known only to long-dead aliens.

Ohhh... well... didn't know he's come that far already.

'Lunatic' is from Luna = the moon, right?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's always the guillotine option. The preferred option actually.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok, but use an electric one to save the planet.

[–] twotonebax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hand crank like the old school pencil sharpeners

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Forget the hand crank, I volunteer to run in the big hamster wheel to power it.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 day ago

You could throw them into a jumbo jet engine and it still would be a net negative carbon reduction

[–] MattW03@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Damn, the same way Tesla reaches FSD next year, thanks Elon for saving the World one promise at a time! /$

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Punchable face of an apartheid beneficiary.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

So as a summery investing in spaceX means

  • No intention of a short or long term investment
  • realistically no control over company choices regardless of share type.

The article is pretty accurate: if you buy in you are only there for the ride. Meaning hopefully you are there hoping he actually can produce what he claims he wants to do.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Name one single vision of Musk that he brought to fruition.

And don't say Starlink or Tesla, those had no input from him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Okay, so there's going to be no dividends because it won't be making profit, and the stock price is going to be manipulated by Musk, who's already shown he'll say weird shit on Twitter to drop Tesla's price when he wants to buy some shares back. And on the other hand, the growth part of the equation is also predicated on him saying crazy shit on Twitter. He can't be voted out either.

Crypto seems like a better fucking investment at this point. I hope his IPO fails, but everyone's so hyped up on infinite growth in stocks that are already overvalued that there's just way too much stupid money going around right now.

Yes, I need to make sure SpaceX stays focused on making life multiplanetary and extending consciousness to the stars, not pandering to someone’s bullshit quarterly earnings bonus!

That's all well and good, but if you consider how rich he is, and how he has rich friends who probably share his ideals, it becomes fairly obvious that this is the rug pull of the century. Otherwise if he doesn't want to be liable for making number go up, he could make sure that only people who agree with him own any stock rather than going public.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›