this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
284 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

48694 readers
873 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Yes, I "like" the surprises scanning a unknown QR code. I hate this crap, same as this short URLs, it's not different from clicking on shady ad banners. A trustworth website don't need this shit, hiding its domain.

https://www.expandurl.net/

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Yeah I'm not picking up my phone to use your website. Bye.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 38 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I don't have a smartphone and I keep running into more and more of these QR codes. If I, as a citizen, am required to get a smartphone for these QR codes, to do citizen-like things, then it should be a utility and prices for hardware and services should come way down.

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 2 points 51 minutes ago

Just like they did with automobiles!

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You get by without a smartphone? I was really late to get one but you just can't function in today's society without one where I'm at. In the Heart of Darkness here.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You can function in today's society just fine, it's just less convenient.

But the problem here is not only that you need a smartphone to begin with, but also one specifically from either Google or Apple. Having something else (like a phone with Sailfish or GrapheneOS or any other custom rom) also doesn't work.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I am switching to graphene OS first chance I get, it should be this summer, damn the consequences.

I lived most of my life without any type of cell phone let alone a smart one. I'm going back to our roots, to reject this techno fascist bullshit it's only downhill from here on their gear.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, please. The more users we have on Graphene the harder we are to ignore as a user base.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The general crowd doesn't seem to care about the trends that make graphene common sense and I suspect that Google would take measures if it ever did like they're currently doing to fdroid.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

In at least some sectors, even this enshitified EU should be forced to stop Google from being anti-competitive towards graphene to some extent.

The US is fucked but I don't know about the rest of the world necessarily, kind of a free-for-all right now.

[–] kevinsky@feddit.nl 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

They are working on their "own" phone which should alleviate a fair number of concerns with what Google might be doing to sabotage them.

[–] farfalla@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago

Yet, will they be able to develop their own OS when google stop sharing the code with them ? I do hope so...

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

i'm glad to know this!!! do you have any more info?

[–] klep@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

oic, i was already aware of motorola's partnership; i thought you meant that graphene was going to make their own phone.

thanks anyways, though; it's nice when people respond in good faith.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Same here. I'm waiting for Motorola to join in.

[–] mik3dd0@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 hours ago

That's actually a really good point! 🤔

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

These are so useless. A barrier that is likely already broken by bots.

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think I read on a lemmy post the other day that archive.is... kills babies? I don't remember what it was, but that they're bad and shouldn't be used because of the badness.

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Apparenly DDOSing a blog iirc. You're not allowed to use it over at the Europe community because of it.

[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

DDOSing a blog that was doing free work for Big Copyright and Big Paywall by trying to doxx the archive.is operator.

[–] mik3dd0@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

So it begins.

[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't scanning random QR codes super risky? This is just begging to be abused....

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I never trusted it, I've never my life scanned a QR code with my phone. But I never learned about it so whatever I just naturally do not trust anything computer.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 32 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Send an email to their webmaster if you haven't already. The more of us, the better.

[–] wooferTwo@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Really only way to fight back... There are alternatives to this shit

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

it feels like an updated version of "strongly worded letter"

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 34 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If you click the eye icon at the bottom you can go back the original captcha. For now at least.

Also I have no idea why archive.is uses reCAPTCHA from google! You've set up monaro as your only donation system so clearly you care about privacy but you haven't implemented an open source captcha?

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, their privacy, not yours, evidently

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 51 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Prove I'm human? Sure... [closes tab]

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 53 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

That's what google's been using to lockout non official Android forks like GrapheneOS. You can click on the eye icon at the bottom to get the regular captcha though... for now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ah yes, my very real human ability of scanning QR codes. Truly an inherent characteristic of humanity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 150 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I would assume this was trying to deliver malware if I ever saw it

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

It arguably is malware.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 15 points 18 hours ago

It'll certainly cause more people to get malware by normalizing people to scan QR codes on a whim without thinking

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 114 points 1 day ago (12 children)

reCAPTCHA protects. your privacy and does not share your details with this website or app.

We foxes promise not to let any predators into the henhouse.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 39 minutes ago

reCAPTCHA protects. your privacy

I love how they used that period. Seems way better than that lawyer guy from the Simpsons.

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They said it wasn't shared with the website. They didn't say it wasn't shared with anyone at all.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago

Reminds me of those privacy policies. "We don't sell your data!" in the big type. When you dig more into the fine print... they don't! But they do "share it within their partner family of companies". And then THOSE companies sell it. Or sometimes, sell inferences made from it, even if not sell the data.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] JohnDarlen@lemmy.today 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Any service implementing this shit will be on my list of never using it again. Even if my bank do such shit I'll be moving to another one. Zero tolerancy. This is beyond the limits.

[–] freijon@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's easy to say this now. But what if, in a few years, 90% of websites and service providers use this?

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

I'll be done using the internet!

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 17 hours ago

I agree, and this is strictly because Google wants to kill forks like Graphene OS. Anybody who implements this is going to get their tab immediately closed on my browser and I'm never going back. I will have zero tolerance for this.

load more comments
view more: next ›