this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5033 readers
137 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

It's crazy how hard the media has been working to convince millions of Aussies trying to make ends meet that these changes are somehow bad for them.

[–] nigel@piefed.social 4 points 4 weeks ago

Do you see this being challenged anywhere? I'm only on piefed, and it all seems pretty sane here. And IRL the groups I move in get it. But there are plenty of others who could undo it all.

I almost feel like putting up posters around the neighborhood or something.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The capital gains discount removal is bad for anyone with any investments, and people without any investments aren’t going to be any better off because of it.

[–] Tenderizer@aussie.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They basically had to include all capital gains because otherwise the consolation tax cut wouldn't be worth the paper it's written on. The $250 annual WATO is small, but it's big relative to the amount the average Australian's investments will suffer.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 weeks ago

A $250 tax cut isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yeah. Front page of news.com.au. guy with 150 properties says the new changes will ramp up rent and benefit rich people

Pretty sure they've been ramping up rent anyway 😂

At least now some of it is tax, which can also be used for first home owners grant and towards helping the disadvantaged

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 weeks ago

First home owner grants do nothing but increase house prices by the same amount lol.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Absolutely agree with your idea there, but maybe durect the funds to building new housing department houses, that's what lowers or at least keeps prices on keel, adding more avenues into an already overinflated market, like more first home buyers grants etc, will just push the prices up more, like all the other policies put in place recently have.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah.. Agree. That would be better. The point is to provide an advantage when first home owners buy

I am fortunate that i had help from my parents, but, I'd dread to not have that possibility

[–] nigel@piefed.social 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's no surprise that those with money who are being impacted are making as much noise as possible. It really irked me when there was all that startup meme rubbish, mainly because of how misleading and disingenuous it was.

But, I think there is room for improvement. I take the view that two of the main problems Australia has are:

  1. lack of personal financial security because people don't live in their own homes, part of which is the cost of living issues, homelessness, and just general fear which leads to a lot of the right wing opportunism.

  2. Poor business environment, caused by high operating costs (see point 1 - it's the same cause) and poor funding environment. This in turn leads to a lack of sovereign capabilities, meaning we buy foreign services riddled with surveillance (see electric cars, online services, government services contracts, etc).

What we need is housing not to be used for speculation, and high investor returns, and have it used for providing security and shelter to people.

We need that money to now be put into Australian businesses. Specifically new and small businesses, but really, any business that actually does things in the world, employs Australians, and adds to our national capability.

Make a carve out for those businesses (not just startups) so the tax sector incentives building Australia's capabilities, not rent seeking, not speculation, not investing in foreign assets.

[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

seems Albanese still hasn't learnt the first rule of how the Liberal Party responds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHash5takWU

I don't know what they have to say It makes no difference anyway Whatever it is, I'm against it No matter what it is or who commenced it I'm against it

Your proposition may be good But let's have one thing understood: Whatever it is, I'm against it And even when you've changed it or condensed it I'm against it