this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
190 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

31559 readers
2474 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Canals were at least solving a problem that actually existed and needed solving at the time when they were started. AI data centres are being built in anticipation of future demand, for use cases that haven't been developed yet.

[–] poopsmith@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not accurate from my understanding. I quit my SDE job in December, but my former coworkers say they use AI pretty much all day and find it useful. Ofc, the company’s systems were an indecipherable mess, mostly because of rushed choices those same people made everyday, but neither here nor there. This is why tech companies are cutting jobs.

Whether any of this is sustainable remains to be seen, but there are current use cases and real demand for “AI” data centers.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 hour ago

Current tech layoffs are mostly a result of over hiring during the pandemic. Blaming AI is just the sales pitch to investors try to prove that the AI spending was worth it.

[–] epyon22@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

A few years ago with ARM arriving at the data centers I envisioned there would be a day that density would go up and new data centers would be less in demand. I'm either too early or wrong.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 2 points 29 minutes ago

In economics, the Jevons paradox, or Jevons effect, is said to occur when technological improvements that increase the efficiency of a resource's use lead to a rise, rather than a fall, in total consumption of that resource.

Unfortunately using less of a good thing isn't how we do things.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

I'm thinking you might have been wrong. Even without AI, I don't foresee demand for compute going down. Even if everything went over to ARM, I think that would have just slowed the rate of new builds.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

At least canals are still useful to have around for recreational watersports.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 25 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

The Internet has ruined me because I can't read the word "watersports" without thinking of the fetish anymore.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Gooned*

from the Olde English "guined" —an easy mix-up

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Well I am sure some canals are next to dogging sites

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Right, that's what the canals are useful for, what did you think they meant?

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 14 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Not really. Most of these old canals were only a couple yards/meters wide and dried up 100 years ago.

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If they're only a couple meters wide, how the heck are they supposed to fit watercraft?

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 2 points 40 minutes ago

The barges were just a little less than a few meters wide. The manpower to build a 100km long canal that is 2.5-3 meters wide is substantially less than what it takes to dig one 8 meters wide in the era before steam shovels.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

But are they only 3 feet deep? /s

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

not enough attention is being paid to the drunken stumble into the canal that drowned someone! /s

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 57 minutes ago

Ahh that sucks, we have quite a few of ours still

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The choice to compare data centers to canals rather than to railroads seems rather arbitrary.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago

It's not arbitrary at all. In fact it's the entire point.

Just think, after the systems-manufactured destitute addicts clean out the rare metals from those industrial pustules, the whole country's houseless will have homes, right?

Right?