this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
102 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84920 readers
4103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Other open source software gets similar treatment, with Colorado going as far as explicitly excluding code repositories and container platforms.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 37 points 2 hours ago

Its not enough. Eradicate the bills.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 32 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

It's not really a win though. It just means Linux will get blocked by platforms.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Fuck the platforms. We'll make our own.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 57 minutes ago

We're literally on one "we" made on our own right now. So yeah, exactly, we'll make our own. With blackjack... and hookers. In fact forget the platforms.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 hours ago

The fun part of open source is that someone smarter than me will inevitably just update the existing spoofing tools to include whatever checks those platforms are using.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 30 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

oh wow gee thank you for not… [checks notes]… forcing open source developers to write state mandated spyware without compensation

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 8 points 2 hours ago

"Thank you for not forcing me to participate in your getting-kicked-in-the-balls program... But perhaps just don't?"

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I would not accuse the legislators of any decency of thought only that open source would be far harder to police due to its more nebulous and intermingled path to the client with far less money at the end of it.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There may have also been some big money lobbyists from companies like Google, Amazon, etc, that pointed out how much money it would have cost their poor shareholders to implement.

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 2 points 26 minutes ago

The entire dynamic is off somehow, so age verification is for the safety of children but won't be implemented on some platforms for reasons that are by extension more pressing than child safety, as if such reasons might exist. It is almost like age verification is actually nothing to do with child safety.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 hours ago