this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
364 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21638 readers
1124 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Department of Public Works employee Eric Batman claims that having to see a Progress Pride flag flying outside the department’s Alhambra, California, headquarters during the month of June effectively forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin” in conflict with his sincerely held Christian religious beliefs, according to a lawsuit filed in March by anti-LGBTQ+ evangelical nonprofit the Liberty Counsel.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 11 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

I also think the Progress Pride Flag represents conduct and actions I view as sin. Not like, gender/sexual sin. Design sin.

The rainbow flag was already perfect. The rainbow flag to me says "human behavior exists on a spectrum, and everyone matters". It's beautiful, elegant. The stripes don't represent distinct groups, though sinners (the flag redesigners, not LGBTQ+ people) have tried. The flag itself represents harmony in diversity. You can't get better than that, no notes.

The Progress flag is meddling with a perfect formula. It takes a perfect symbol to celebrate diversity itself and plasters it with footnotes. By highlighting specific groups that were included by the rainbow in the first place, it just opens the door to more and more complex revisions to include more and more distinct groups. It turns a poignant symbol of broad inclusiveness into a weird patchwork of granular inclusiveness. That would seem like hyperbole if the pictured flag wasn't already the intersex-inclusive revision.

It's just sloppy vexillology. The rainbow flag is awesome. Why are we fucking with it?

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.world 5 points 42 minutes ago

Hear hear. I refuse to use it for this exact reason. The rainbow flag is such a strong symbol!

[–] CptHacke@piefed.social 30 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's very simple. We'll get rid of the pride flags as soon as they get rid of all the crosses. Fair is fair, after all.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

The fucking crosses, man.

You think Jesus ever would want to see another cross again?

Dude wouldn't be able to take Public Transit in Boston.

If Jesus came back he probably wouldn't even use the letter "t".

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Imagine resurrecting into a world full of people wearing crosses with you nailed to them all just acting like it's not fucked

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 minutes ago

Then you go to church and see them eat your flesh and blood.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

That brings a whole new dimension to the T, but you know what, after being subjected to the green line more than a few times it entirely makes sense.

[–] poprocks@lemmy.world 5 points 49 minutes ago

So they can take down the flag but that means no Easter decorations or Christmas decorations and definitely canceling the Christmas holiday because I don't want to be forced to celebrate your beliefs you weak twat.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago

Someone should punch him in the throat

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 26 minutes ago

Somebody should sue him for suing for seeing a flag. If that's the way we gon play it.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 19 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You know, if youre gonna be this pathetic we should be able to exile you to an island.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 28 minutes ago

Hey... Australia...

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

If this works, is it not precedent to make the same complaint every time I see a cross?

[–] v3ritas@infosec.pub 11 points 2 hours ago

Or see “god” anywhere.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Maybe. Sometimes different rules apply to government (public) property vs private.

lmao cry about it idiot

pride is unstoppable 💜💛🤍🩷🩵🤎🖤❤️🧡💛💚💙💜

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

I assume this is an effort to create another suit that will get all the way to SCOTUS so that white Christian nationalists get yet another carve-out of everyone else's civil liberties.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Snowflake much?

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

Why do so many right-wing Christians sound like the villain from a Criminal Minds episode?

Like...this MFer thinks he has a right to make other people not exist for his comfort. Fucking psycho when you dig into it.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

His faith must be weak for it to be shaken so easily.

[–] bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 hours ago

If I exercise my free speech in the woods with no one around to hear it, is it free speech?

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Meanwhile my church:

(ALT: The words "The Episcopal Church" in white above a variation of a shield graphic that has a blue field in the upper left with a series of white crosses forming an X shape; pink, blue, brown, black diagonal stripes on the right; the classic Pride rainbow colors of purple, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red forming the remaining sections with a white cross holding them all together)

EDIT: I tried to use a spoiler tag/format but I apparently suck at that. Sorry. Don't sue me!

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

He's not wrong, which is why we should not acknowledge or grant any privileges to any religion. Practice what you want but you should get no special privilege or consideration.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Holy homophobia Batman! It's 1984 and the Big Gay shoves gay frogs down a christian throat! Should've sued his maker for making him a whiney tool with pretty offending vibes of one another cross-cluthing mass shooter.

Love thy neighbor

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 266 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (6 children)

It must be hard to be this fragile little bitch of a bigot.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 85 points 6 hours ago (27 children)

Ya know....I really hate that people use the term "snowflake" to describe soft sensitive people. My logic is simple. When I grew up, I was taught that snowflakes were unique and beautiful. Individually a work of art on their own or can work together to form something greater.

I don't want that beautiful word to describe these foul creatures.

Instead I suggest they are called "little bitches". Use that term instead of snowflakes from now on.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

In the early years of the alt-right and 4chan/b, the derisive use of snowflake was a counter to the notion that everyone is special, noting that while snowflakes are unique and beautiful, they're also superfluously abundant.

It smacks of social Darwinism, the notion that there's too many people and fair treatment of them all is unaffordable, which is only the case when a few hold an extremely disproportionate amount of wealth and power.

(As an aside, the extreme wealth/power disparity that we see today is a symptom of the decay of a society that precedes decline and collapse, at least as we've seen in history. Before the US, an embarrassment of riches was exactly that. In the states, since the rise of the gold rush and the railroad barons, extreme wealth in the US has become an object of admiration and aspiration. The American dream is to join the billionaire class, no matter how rarely it actually happens.)

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Calling them "snowflakes" is just to point out their hypocrisy.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Agree.

Rotten Shitbag could also work.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 hours ago

Forcing me to see a crosses and churches on my drive to work violate my religious beliefs all.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Pride also is notably not a religious belief. Its a belief in fundamental human rights and equality under the law.

If my religion was that "all government is evil" then there's no amount of government that would not offend my sensibilities. Notably a lot if "sovereign citizens" believe exactly this and happen to be religious christians.

This should be treated with even more ridicule than sovereign citizen beliefs because this is being offended by a belief specifically opposed to the equality of the law.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I used to have to drive past this fucking thing on my way to work. We banning those too?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I know where this is, I hate it.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 119 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (7 children)

And not a single person has complained about being “forced” to see all the churches he also goes past.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

So yes, but also this is slightly different than that. It's about the department itself flying the flag. Still absolutely insane, but slightly less insane than that. The end result, if this person wins, is literally no flags or any other messaging. "My religion doesn't support nationalism." This would also include extreme stances like "my religion doesn't support the periodic table" or things like that.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 63 points 6 hours ago

Waiting for the precedent so the Church of Satan can abuse the fuck out of it to start forcing churches into seclusion

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Christians are so god damned annoying. Why can’t they all just fuck off? Keep their superstition in their conditioning centers, and out of public life. Their fervor is pathetic, but the results they achieve with such animosity damages society in ways that cannot easily be rolled back, if at all.

Fuck ‘em all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 32 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

having to see a Progress Pride flag … forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin”

If it only was that easy to get people to celebrate, recognize, and solemnize gay sex, world would be a better place no doubt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›