this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41382 readers
3909 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Nah, this isn't a great point at all.... even at face value really.

Put slightly differently, if we're assuming people sleep around as much as the text implies, if we focus on birth control solely for men, then one 'failure'/non-controlled man would result in a ton of pregnancies. If the onus is on women, then one 'failure'/non-controlled woman would result in one pregnancy.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Weird how it seems like it's all for women and safe sex but then criticizes a tool women have to checks notes take control of their sex lives and make decisions about getting pregnant.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Non-surgical birth control options for women tend to come with a lot of side effects and a number of risks that don't always outweigh the benefit. Hormonal birth control can cause tons of problems for the women taking them and some of them are associated with life-threatening side effects like increased risk of clotting leading to DVTs, PEs, and strokes.

[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, and male birth control doesn't solve these problems because the only way to be 100% sure is to be on birth control yourself, especially important with huge chunks of the US banning abortions

[–] TommyJohnsFishSpot@lemy.lol 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 1 points 9 months ago

Nowhere does it say you have to limit yourself to that

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I got snipped so my wife didn't have to do the hormonal bullshit. Her doctor is putting her back in it because women's bodies literally do not want them to be happy.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago

How does this unscientific instagram vomit has 500 votes on lemmy? Are we turning into reddit?

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I not sure I can impregnate 9 women in a day but I'm willing to participate in a scientific study to find out if anyone is doing that.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

For nine months.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

That's because hormonal birth control for women takes advantage of existing biological processes to prevent pregnancy.

Men don't have any known biological processes that can be utilized like that, although it's been consistently studied for decades.

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 1 points 9 months ago

I had thought that another part of it was the levels of harm compared to the problem; getting pregnant is incredibly stressful and possibly harmful, up to and including death as a possibility. A medicine that can stop that but has side affects that are less harmful than pregnancy is a lot more palatable. Whereas, for men, the harm caused by pregnancy is zero, so any harm caused by the pill is weighed a lot heavier.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago

Also we have condoms too so i don't get what everyone is talking about

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The most commonly produced, available, and used birth control method worldwide is the latex condom, used by everyone who has a penis. Try again.

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Later that night:

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

9!? You think I can cum 9 times a day!? And apparently hit the egg every fucking time too? I don't mean to question the conclusion because I think birth control should be both parties' responsibility, but I think your premise reveals a distinct lack of grasp on biological reality. Why stop at 9? Why not 900? Really drive your point home! My dick is going to be useless after number 2 or 3 anyway.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

"hit the egg" 🤣😂😭

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's the woman who'd get pregnant and who doesn't want to. Should she rely on whether the men took their pills correctly? Taking hormones sucks for many women, but they're happy to be able to have birth control in their hands.

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I think people forget why the pill was such a game changer: It allowed women, without the permission or knowledge of their husband/sexual partner, to decide whether or not they wanted to get pregnant.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Should there be an temporary contraceptive for men? Yes, it gives agency to men and also provides an alternative to women who can't use female contraception for a multitude of reasons.

Will that be preferred by all women? Hell no

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] mech@feddit.org 1 points 9 months ago

It would be great if there was an alternative to them.
For people in trusting long-term relationships who want to have sex without a condom on.
So that the burden of birth control doesn't default to the woman altering her hormonal balance.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't understand the downvotes. Condoms are great.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Dumb. It's a lot easier to stop one egg a month, than zillions of sperm multiple times a day. Simple as that.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Condoms are a lot cheaper than the pill and don't come with side effects

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Many people of any gender find sex much less enjoyable with a condom.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know what's a lot less enjoyable than sex with a condom? Everything it prevents

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Sure but you can't argue that Condoms don't have side effects when the clear and obvious side effect is that sex is less enjoyable.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Not only that, there's an interruptible cycle of egg release. There's no regular interruptible cycle in men.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is just logically wrong.

If birth control was only made for men, and 90% of men were on birth control, you could end up with far more pregnancies than if it's for women and 90% of women were on it.

The conclusion is exactly the opposite of the argument.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don’t understand you logic. Are you saying the remaining 10% of men would impregnate a disproportionate amount of women?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

By the logic of the image, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I'm not sure who's she targeting because I know a lot of guys who would love to have birth control pills.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›