this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
334 points (99.1% liked)

Television

2521 readers
555 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 18 points 11 hours ago

Who is surprised? Dumbasses/oligarchs?

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Allen, 65, said from the outset he wasn't chasing Colbert's audience. "At the end of the day, I'm not trying to replace Colbert," he told NPR last month. "I am not trying to hold on to his audience because Comics Unleashed has been around 20 years and has its own audience."

Cool story bro.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I like how the loser replacement guy tries to act like people know who he or his company is

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe I'm old, but Byron Allen is pretty well known in comedy circles...

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This is me pre-googling this, and I was born in the early 80s: who in the fuck is Byron Allen? Never heard of him.

Ok. Im gonna go plop a Goog on it and answer my own question.

Edit: post-google, who the fuck is Byron Allen?

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

If you say so... I've heard of a handful of shows/projects he's worked on, but it sounds to me that after decades of grind, THIS is his big break aaand most people aren't happy about it. Not his fault obviously, but definitely a bad career decision if you ask me.

Also, we meet again prole 🤣

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 77 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, I doubt they care. The plan is just to monopolize them anyway and turn them all into rank propaganda factotries.

Good ol Ministry of Truth.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 41 points 15 hours ago

The classic playbook for authoritarian takeover is to first start with symbols, like Trump's name and face everywhere. Capture institutions by putting loyalists in high places and push out the critics. Get the judges in your pocket. Control the media.

The program is going hard.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 hours ago

That literally all they have been for the last 10 years - democrat propaganda factories.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago

The value of twitter was never twitter

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 56 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It’s so crazy. CBS used to be my go to source for broadcast news and I used to associate it with high quality programming.

After this whole fiasco I wouldn’t touch anything associated with them with a 50 foot pole.

[–] iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app 29 points 17 hours ago

Killing any news source that values truth in any way is a goal. So, mission accomplished by the fascists.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 116 points 23 hours ago

They did it to themselves.

[–] ghostpony@infosec.pub 91 points 22 hours ago

You love to see it

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 hours ago

Yet it’s a net positive for the network since Colbert lost them a shitload of money:

"With this 'time buy' model, we have shifted an hour that was losing roughly $40 million annually to $15 million in profit — a $55 million swing."

Not the article only compares the viewership numbers from the end of Colberts run too, where more people tuned in since it was ending, not before its cancellation was announced.

[–] SteveCC@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago

Colbert and 60 Minutes.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 57 points 22 hours ago

Surprising nobody. I wonder if doing favors to corruptly ensure the Paramount merger went through will pay off for the mega-corp. Probably.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 10 hours ago

Guys I haven't had a TV in 6 years. I think you too can save your selves.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 33 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The audience numbers crashing is just fine with Trump as well.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

Yup, the lot of them are salivating over the way they killed two birds with one stone.

[–] Dionysus@leminal.space 22 points 21 hours ago

They want to make CBS like his casinos.

He'd rather everyone only spend their time with Fox & Friends

[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 22 hours ago

CBS Crap Broadcast System

[–] mrsilkworm@piefed.social 7 points 18 hours ago
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The show is still going? Who is hosting?

No, it's the new programming replacing colbert that has collapsing ratings.

[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Wait they put someone else on the late show? I had no idea lol

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

You don't even need to click the article, OP pasted the part explaining this at the top...

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite, it's a guy who bought the slot for his own show, same guy you end up seeing super late at night with Comics Unleashed. He's a weird dude.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think he's somehow super wealthy? Like a billionaire even, maybe?

Real weird.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I did a short dive into his whole deal even before this whole situation. I think he's probably just around $1B, because he went from comedian and writer to investor. I mean, he owns part of BuzzFeed, even.

And yeah. It is weird that he's done a fair amount for black causes, but somehow he's willing to put up with CBS? There's always a contradiction when you have money but do things for community. Though I personally just always felt the was off, the same way I felt about Jay Leno.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago

Ya I stopped watching after they took him off lol

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I guess if someone keeps paying for the spot they won’t care, because it will still be profit for them in their eyes.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's not profit, though.

It was what's called a "loss leader". You lose money on one product so you get back more on another product.

The other word for "loss leader" is "investment". You spend money in one place so you get back more elsewhere.

What CBS did is basically like a grocery store having a cheap and delicious food by the entryway to attract customers and then deciding that they were losing money on it, removing it, and then going "Oh, shit, we don't have any customers anymore! We're not making any money at all."

Good luck with that godawful Comics Unleashed show.

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Wouldn’t a better comparison be that they stopped selling the delicious food and are now renting out the empty space to someone else? I don’t think they are footing the bill for the new show unless I missed that part?

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No-risk profit to be exact.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

This is more like all risk.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz -1 points 19 hours ago

_fffffffffttttttttppth! How m I gonna piss if not IH nIdaho