this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
85 points (88.3% liked)

Gaming

7828 readers
48 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They are the freaking same.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

At this point it's branding. I have no problem with it.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 23 points 3 days ago

If it aint fix, dont broke it. I am kinda hoping this one flops and kills AAA games. Gamers are depraved though, and they will probably just lower their standards.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 3 days ago

Yup, that's definitely a GTA cover.

[–] JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social 18 points 3 days ago

People really gonna trash on a unique style that dates back to 2Fucking000 and the PAL version of GTA2? We really got nothing to do so we complain about game covers? Come on now.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Will it be better than 5 or just have more hardware demands?

I'm just hoping it won't be one of those "you must be connected to the internet even if you're playing solo" deals.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I am going to push someone into those crocodiles

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this game gonna be like 50 bucks right?

[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’d be surprised if it isn’t triple digits.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Haven't played since GTA:SA...but, it continues to be the exact same game every time, but with added cinematic realism elements and graphics, right? A few more vehicle models to drive? A few more weapons to shoot? Different interaction options and new dialogue? Sexier sex stuff. Seems like a good, if stagnant, business model that retains its play appeal pretty well as long as it adds just a little bit more than the last version had.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 7 points 3 days ago

GTA is GTA? No way!

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Same energy as my dad, who says he doesn’t like modern FPS games because he played Duke Nukem 3D back in 1996 and ‘they’re all the same’.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

LOL, everybody knows you couldn't stop playing FPS games until you'd played Quake 2.

Duh.

Quake 3 arena would like a word

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

Different story, 10x better GPU.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A little bit more is a giant understatement.

The Rage 9 game engine is a giant leap forward in many underlying video game systems.

Rage 8, which powers Red Dead Redemption 2 was basically just a prototype test bed for GTA VI.

Obviously we'll have to wait and see what all actually works and got integrated in VI, but consistently the numbered releases of GTA since III have redefined what is possible in gaming and game engines.

[–] charokol@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The worlds are more and more impressive, but the core gameplay loop still has not changed much since III.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The game play loop is the same, but the tech between III and IV is radically different, Euphoria is something special.

[–] Elting@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Is that the engine which allows you to simulate a space program in IV? Used to be pretty fun to drive into that swing set just to see where you would end up.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please do not abbreviate San Andreas

[–] Sawy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago
[–] etherphon@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so long for this game to come out and the cover looks the same as one they did 20 years ago, way to go guys, amazing work truly

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At this point, no matter what they do, people are going to complain. A lot. Case in point being your comment.

[–] etherphon@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

fair enough I suppose, it is a pretty lose lose situation that way, anyways I guess it lets you know what you are getting

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's also the same general style of cover Rockstar has used for literally every GTA game they've ever made, so...

Why would it change now?

[–] etherphon@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I dunno. To be perfectly honest I don't really think we need an updated version of this gangster simulator, it's outdated, but that's just my lame ass take :P

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean it hasn't really been a gangster simulator since San Andreas. And even then, CJ was never part of a gang during the time you played as him.

[–] etherphon@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Alright crime simulator anyways, I dunno, I know it's just a game and all but the glorification of all of that business just seems like not a super great thing right now considering we have a crime syndicate in charge of our country. It feels like a relic to me but maybe I'm just an optimist.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

GTA doesn't really glorify that lifestyle though? At least in 5 it's made clear that none of the protagonists are particularly happy with their lives even though they're career criminals. In fact they even get blackmailed by a government agency into doing more illegal shit just so they don't get disappeared to a black site and never heard from again.

[–] etherphon@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, I get that, none of those games or movies really glorify that life because what's to glorify really, but it's just the constant exposure to the wanton violence of the game and people's worst instincts kicking in. I don't really have anything against the game or whatever, I will just be interested to see if it's ever studied about how those games affect peoples attitude towards violence and might erode their ethics in some ways such as turning a blind eye to violence going on around them. Just thoughts anyways. I feel the same way about the Battlefield/Modern Warfare games and horror movies that are basically just torture porn with no redeeming social messages or anything. Anyways, I'm probably being way too serious for a game people use to blow off steam but it's worth a discussion probably, for someone, sometime :P

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's also the same general style of cover Rockstar has used for literally every GTA game they've ever made

Well, except GTA 1, both GTA Londons and GTA2

So, except for half the games.

Either way this is the current style. I thought GTA2 was a neat cover.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's been the style of cover since GTA3

So for 3, VC, SA, LCS, VCS, 4, Episodes, and 5.

That's about 8-ish games that had this style of cover art. That's more than half.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's also the same general style of cover Rockstar has used for literally every GTA game they've ever made, so...

That's about 8-ish games that had this style of cover art. That's more than half.

So literally not all of them then?

5 without, 8 with.

I apologize my “half” statement was imprecise . . .

It's also the same general style of cover Rockstar has used for literally every GTA game they've ever made, so...

my point was that they LITERALLY have not always used this style, and that’s all.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'd also argue that any GTA made before 3 hasn't been relevant in probably 30 years or so.

Also, it's only 4 games before GTA3 and the art style change. Not sure hey you said 5.

Edit: I also forgot about Advance and Chinatown Wars, which both had the same modern cover.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Do us both a solid and go look up the box art, I am positive there will be fandom sites dedicated just to this.

It’s easy, you can count them. It’s 5. Advance had grey box art but included art like the GTA 3.

5 is more than 0 which is what it would take for literally all of them to be one way.

Sorry you believe the games that defined the series are irrelevant, that’s irrelevant to the impetus of my statement.