this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
126 points (97.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

69573 readers
236 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We think that netflix, google, microsoft, amazon, and spotify etc are so convenient and cheap but they are pure evil.

Every dollar we spend on them will fund surveillance capitalism, data centers and private jets of billionaire pedophiles.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

piracy is the only ethical consumption under capitalism

Important reminder: you are not 'supporting artists' when you pay for media.

I live in Los Angeles. I know a lot of art gays. The ones who teach art class and pull down that 'public school teacher' money rent rooms to the ones who work on films with ten figure budgets.

You do not support artists. You fund their exploitation.

I support artists, because I tip cash when I buy coffee.

So while you Jack yourself off about 'supporting artists' by voting with your wallet, I'm gonna use one of those flosser things to get their pubic hair out of my teeth while we look at my favorite Linux ISO's together.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 18 hours ago

Let's not forget about video games. Valve, Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo all feeling like gamers don't spend enough, let's milk them for all they're worth so they can buy more yachts.

You know what? As an Apple guy, go ahead and add Apple and all their investors to the list. As one of the world's wealthiest companies, Apple could absorb the increased hardware costs and still make a profit, but it wasn't enough, so they jacked up prices like everyone else did. To be absolutely fair, they warned everyone twice. The first time when they announced the new CEO a month or two ago. So you know if they're gonna pull some shady shit, they're gonna do it on Cook's watch so Ternus ends up looking good (or better). The second time when they actually told you they were gonna raise prices, like 2-3 weeks ago. Then they actually did it. So you had a chance to get a $500 computer with 16GB of DDR5. Or a laptop with 8GB (the Neo). $100 more if you can't get an education discount (not that hard to do).

I've been saying for a decade, take some of the money you give to billionaires for goods and services, and try to spend it locally. Now I'm saying spend all of it locally. Movies still pay for themselves, and even when one flops ("oh no Masters of the Universe ONLY made like $105 million (but it cost $170 million) according to IMDb. So what though? 70s babies got their cool movie, all the superhero movies will more than make up for it. Or I should say the "other" superhero movies, He-Man is totally a superhero. I do think you should pay for what you love, which is why I went out to see Masters of the Universe. I never watched He-Man and the Masters of the Universe as a kid, but, I did watch ThunderCats (same thing with a better story) and though I know the rights are all tied up so an adaptation is almost impossible... I still hope to see it get similar treatment in my lifetime. I pay for music. I stream via Apple, but I also have offline copies of all my favourite music, stored on my Mac, and stored on my Android phone (backup, no cell service on it, but it has a memory card slot and a headphone jack, and it works fine on WiFi).

[–] Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I feel the same way about big corpo social media. All these people screaming “boycott billionaires” below an ad that funds the billionaires.

[–] remon@ani.social 16 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Eh, I pirate because most of these services are NOT convenient. Claiming to "save the world" seems a bit bit over the top though. I just like to collect and watch stuff on my own terms.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

I stopped basically all discretionary spending in 2025, particularly when Trump was threatening to invade my country (with most of these companies being American) while all the shitty billionaires were smiling pleasantly and cheerfully glazing him. Amazon Prime cancelled, Netflix cancelled. My policy is: fuck these turbocunts from now on and steal everything that isn't nailed down. From now on, I only support real human people, and corporations are certainly not people, they are the opposite of people, and the real human people they employ are being exploited, and I don't support that either. I am going to start opting out of this shitty economy to the fully extent humanly possible. I'll find real humans to build a resilient, supportive, sustainable community with, people's whose backs I will have, and who will have mine, and I will of course freely share all my pirate booty with them.

They might get some of us, but they'll never get all of us. That's how we save the world, my friends. You don't have to rescue everyone from this dystopia, you just have to rescue your friends and family and neighbors, which enables them to rescue more, and pretty soon the dystopia starts to look more like a block party, and it doesn't need anyone's permission. We have more than enough essentials on this planet for all of us to survive on our own, they're just distributed unfairly and hoarded, and for all the non-essentials that we have become addicted to, we'll figure out how to substitute or perhaps even improve on. They're non-essential by definition, and we can do better, and we should do better. I don't need all this plastic shit in my life to survive, and neither do you. We should keep some of it though, it's sort of fun.

[–] morto@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago

Every dollar we spend on them will fund surveillance capitalism, data centers and private jets of billionaire pedophiles.

I wish more people would acknowledge this and turn away from big corps as well

[–] pwxd@lemmy.zip 4 points 18 hours ago

I pirate since when I was a kid, I never get the appeal of subscription cause I can buy a snack with that money

[–] el_twitto@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] silly_goose@lemmy.today 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah because Meta is trash and has nothing worth pirating afaik. Meta itself pirates lots of books to train their LLMs. 😆

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(Un?)ironically for corporations Meta is likely the most valuable one

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know if the world. But surely we are saving culture.

It's not the first time a streaming platform decides to delete an episode because of censure.

For instance, community famous d&d episode.

They cannot delete culture in by HDD.

[–] porcelainpitcher@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Did the platforms/a platform delete the Community D&D episode??! That's one of the very best and funny episodes.

[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Piracy still gives them a platform to justify their surveillance. The only correct take is a full boycott

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Piracy still gives them a platform to justify their surveillance.

It's a bullshit justification and they would be surveilling anyway. People shouldn't base their actions on how dishonest, exploitative capitalists will portray it.

The only correct take is a full boycott

False. There is no such thing as a "correct take" much less a single correct viewpoint. There are many valid means to resist capitalism. Piracy is generally better than boycotting because it's easier and requires no sacrifice. Thus it is far more likely to be widely adopted, as we've already seen. Many many people are already pirating compared to some imaginary boycott.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 7 points 1 day ago

Also pushing for DRM-free contents, and understanding the only plan being destruction only benefits those who discreetly hoard power.

And tangential, but money is trivial when one has power. Plus, these companies seem to just joard control, while answering to centralizing countries. So I would wonder if truly the intent is "capitalism", with whatever negative adjectives are added to further distort the combined notion of free market, minimalist state and meritocracy.

[–] silly_goose@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

gives them a platform to justify their surveillance

How does that work? I thought piracy and watching youtube with adblock actually drains the resources of big tech faster than a boycott.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think they're saying that capitalists will use piracy as a justification for surveilling people.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 17 hours ago

They'll use anything, so piracy is not anything special in that regard.

There's a reason their battlecry is "think of the children".

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Yes and no. A lot of the content is made by creators who have no interest in justifying surveillance. And even the ones that do try to justify things like that ... if you keep your brain awake, you can probably enjoy things without internalizing the message.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

When I pirate something, I have no clue what company or service it is from. How is it giving them a platform?