AutistoMephisto

joined 2 years ago
[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

What's funny is this guy has 25 years of experience as a software developer. But three months was all it took to make it worthless. He also said it was harder than if he'd just wrote the code himself. Claude would make a mistake, he would correct it. Claude would make the same mistake again, having learned nothing, and he'd fix it again. Constant firefighting, he called it.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The top comment on the article points that out.

It's an example of a far older phenomenon: Once you automate something, the corresponding skill set and experience atrophy. It's a problem that predates LLMs by quite a bit. If the only experience gained is with the automated system, the skills are never acquired. I'll have to find it but there's a story about a modern fighter jet pilot not being able to handle a WWII era Lancaster bomber. They don't know how to do the stuff that modern warplanes do automatically.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's interesting is what he found out. From the article:

I forced myself to use Claude Code exclusively to build a product. Three months. Not a single line of code written by me. I wanted to experience what my clients were considering—100% AI adoption. I needed to know firsthand why that 95% failure rate exists.

I got the product launched. It worked. I was proud of what I’d created. Then came the moment that validated every concern in that MIT study: I needed to make a small change and realized I wasn’t confident I could do it. My own product, built under my direction, and I’d lost confidence in my ability to modify it.

 

Just want to clarify, this is not my Substack, I'm just sharing this because I found it insightful.

The author describes himself as a "fractional CTO"(no clue what that means, don't ask me) and advisor. His clients asked him how they could leverage AI. He decided to experience it for himself. From the author(emphasis mine):

I forced myself to use Claude Code exclusively to build a product. Three months. Not a single line of code written by me. I wanted to experience what my clients were considering—100% AI adoption. I needed to know firsthand why that 95% failure rate exists.

I got the product launched. It worked. I was proud of what I’d created. Then came the moment that validated every concern in that MIT study: I needed to make a small change and realized I wasn’t confident I could do it. My own product, built under my direction, and I’d lost confidence in my ability to modify it.

Now when clients ask me about AI adoption, I can tell them exactly what 100% looks like: it looks like failure. Not immediate failure—that’s the trap. Initial metrics look great. You ship faster. You feel productive. Then three months later, you realize nobody actually understands what you’ve built.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Evil sustains. Not sure why and science has yet to yield answers. One of the Rothschilds would get continued organ transplants to sustain his life, often from organ donors who did not know they were organ donors, usually from third-world countries.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

He actually said at his most recent press conference that he's upset because he hasn't been golfing for the last three weeks.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Carl Schmitt literally wrote the book on fascism as an ideology. Hell, he was even in the Nazi Party, sort of like the Curtis Yarvin of his time. Which is interesting because Yarvin kind of idolizes Schmitt and quotes him frequently. Being in the Nazi Party didn't last very long, though, as he was forewarned that soon he was to be ousted from his role in the Party, as the regime no longer had need of philosophers, and he was also concerned that he would be outed as a Hegelian.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (15 children)

This. Violence against fascists isn't really violence, it's enforcement of the societal End User License Agreement.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Fascists only know one language, and that is violence. They firmly believe "Might makes right" and so, we must show them strength such that they fear to challenge us ever again.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ooh I should send one, too. Call him out for a little 1v1 and see if he shows up or if Feds do.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is just a meme, but it does touch on something important. There's a journalist by the name of Douglas Rushkoff. He put out a book last year titled, Survival of the Richest: Escape Fantasies of the Tech Billionaire Elite, and he was invited by a group of 5 anonymous tech oligarchs out to the desert to talk about surviving what they call "The Event", or when the consequences of their actions finally catch up to them.

He also says at the core of their desire to escape it is rooted in something he calls "The Mindset", which is belief that with enough money and technology, wealthy men can live as gods, and transcend the calamities and tribulations that befall us mere mortals.

"The Mindset" is rooted in empirical science, that human beings are nothing more than the sum total of their chemical components, and that's it, and only the "truly superior" (Billionaire Tech Broligarchs) understand that.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Would that we could. "We the People" are the enemy of the State and they treat us accordingly. Of course, the easiest type of enemy to defeat is one that does not know they are your enemy, and they spent billions of dollars over decades to ruin our education systems and shove propaganda in our faces to ensure that we never find out that we were their enemy all along.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

There are a couple evil yet competent people in the administration. Russell Vought is one, a hire direct from the Heritage Foundation. Another is Stephen Miller. Heritage seems to be full of actually competent yet completely evil men. But I guess that what happens when a majority of your funding comes from oil, gas, and now tech barons.

view more: next ›