You've been denying every bit of that and been explicitly pro-israel to the point of deleting pro Palestinian comments over non-existent rules violations over in the news community.
I remember you defending the Sde Teiman torture-rape camp when the videos first came to light.
I find it impossible to believe someone, let alone a biased moderator of News, that defended Sde Teiman would find anything disturbing.
P.S. tags are fun.
A statement that makes it clear you haven't paid attention go Libya since NATO destroyed it.
Maybe they'll do a better job than NATO.
Can't get much worse.
Germanies legal definition of antisemitism includes criticism of Israel.
I'm also using this, and it works.
I'm enjoying how the obvious rebuttal to this stupid propaganda talking point is now so widespread I don't have to say it anymore.
Bibi has been the head of the government in Israel for twenty something years and ran a pretty rightwing and harsh genocidal apartheid regime.
You don't beat them by being them.
You also don't win by lying about Obama assassinating American Citizens intentionally.
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?hp
But, by all means, please continue lying.
You may be mistaking him for one of his children whom we've also killed.
It absolutely was targeted.
Why are you saying it wasn't?
They're attempting to justify the unjustifiable.
They're polite and calm about it, you're correct. But those words pertain to how information is transmitted, not something that can be used to consider the morality of the information contained therein.
Do not confuse a kind way of saying horrible things as making the horrible things not horrible.
You're more respectful then the person you are responding to deserves.
So freedom of speech shouldn't allow people to say that apartheid South Africa shouldn't exist? That Nazi Germany shouldn't be allowed to exist?
I can remember when opposing apartheid ethnostates was the correct moral opinion.
What happened?
What makes Israel different?
Or are double standards proof of anti semitism only when they're negative?
EDIT: No response needed from moral cowards that would have protected apartheid South Africa, Belgium Congo, or Nazi Germany from criticism that they should not be allowed to exist.
You probably won't read this, but things like this are EXACTLY why freedom of speech exists.
You would have condemned Nat Turner and justified slavery.