If companies like OpenAI were more astute, they would recognize that they can accumulate sufficient information to compete in other markets and evolve into technology firms capable of outpacing their competitors. If managed properly, they could even frame it as a form of reverse engineering. And if everything related to AI were truly just a bubble that eventually burst, it would make little difference whether they began as AI companies, since their ultimate purpose could shift over time. And yes, I am being ironic with “if they were more astute,” because I believe that what I am describing is clearly already being considered.
Dsklnsadog
joined 2 years ago
Oh man that sucks
Can I ask you how old are you and why are you on sick leave? Your family can't help you?
Honestly, I find it ridiculous that companies like Disney want to claim ownership over the data used to train AI models. Training data isn’t duplication, it’s learning. The same way humans study, reference, and reinterpret. Trying to monetize every aspect of “influence” is a slippery slope that stifles innovation just to protect legacy revenue streams.
This isn't about fairness, it's about control. And the more these companies try to dominate every avenue of cultural expression, the more irrelevant they risk becoming.
We need to be autocritic here. Most of us don't get it. That's the problem.
At this point we know the users are in fault
If the race is a must, then yes. If the race is a preference, then no.
Decentralized, yeah sure!
Sorry, I misunderstood then. I use Librewolf btw, great choice.
We vote with our browser. And you are voting Chromium. It's ok, but you could do something about it.
This is a rebranding of Google Play Movies, or TV or whatever they call it.
If I travel to Japan (just for fun, not for this) I am not allowed to buy the Switch 2? Or is there any regional restriction?
view more: next ›
Who are you?