FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

then again

but it also mixed "clearly identifiable personal data"—such as the actual number and gender of Holmen's children and the name of his hometown—with the "fake information,"

The made up bullshit aside, this should be a quite clear indicator of an actual GDPR breach

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No I'm not, that part is absolutely hallucinated. Where the problem comes in is that it then output correct personal information about him and his children. A to me clear violation of GDPR.

but it also mixed "clearly identifiable personal data"—such as the actual number and gender of Holmen's children and the name of his hometown—with the "fake information,"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.

No? When they train AI's on data they lose control of that data. If the data is sensitive, they aren't being responsible.

GPT models are as you say dumb statistical models, I agree. But in its weights are encoded ghost images of its training data. The model being dumb is not sufficient to make the data storing itself defensible in my opinion.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It's not unreadable, it doesn't exist.

Then what do you mean trained AI models are?

The ai model is trained on data and encodes unknown parts of that data in its weights.

This is data storage. Unmanageable, almost unknowable data storage, but still data storage.

If it didn't store data it couldn't learn from its training.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The fact you chose to make your data storage unreadable, doesn't relieve you of the responsibilities inherent to storing the data.

Throwing away my car key won't protect me from paying parking tickets i accrue while being physically unable to move my car.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't believe automatic swerving is a good idea, depending on what's off to the side it has the potential to make a bad situation much worse.

I'm thinking like, kid runs into the street, car swerves and mows down a crowd on the sidewalk

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

if it can actually sense a crash is imminent, why wouldn't it be programmed to slam the brakes instead of just turning off?

Do they have a problem with false positives?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

21%

What the fuck

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

they generally do

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“But humans can do it with their eyes!”

That's the best part, they kinda can't.
There are videos from before they pulled the sensors of some pretty cool stuff where teslas slammed the breaks before anything visibly happened, based on lidar sensors sensing trouble a couple cars up the road, completely blocked to vision.

super cool safety tech, and then they pulled it....

one example here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIcC2ZMePKI

view more: ‹ prev next ›