FreedomAdvocate

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 9 months ago (18 children)

You can “use” them to learn from, just like “AI” can.

What exactly do you think AI does when it “learns” from a book, for example? Do you think it will just spit out the entire book if you ask it to?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 16 points 9 months ago (23 children)

Makes sense. AI can “learn” from and “read” a book in the same way a person can and does, as long as it is acquired legally. AI doesn’t reproduce a work that it “learns” from, so why would it be illegal?

Some people just see “AI” and want everything about it outlawed basically. If you put some information out into the public, you don’t get to decide who does and doesn’t consume and learn from it. If a machine can replicate your writing style because it could identify certain patterns, words, sentence structure, etc then as long as it’s not pretending to create things attributed to you, there’s no issue.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Six of Trump’s cabinet secretaries authored or contributed to Project 2025.

That doesn't mean that Project 2025 is being followed. It's not. It's not Trumps plan.

Your claim wasn't that those 6 people contributed to Project 2025, it's that Project 2025 was this governments plan.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 9 months ago

That's basically subdividing, and no you can't just do that to your hearts content. You need to get council etc sign off, new plots drawn up, etc.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Reddit does IP bans and device fingerprinting for site-wide permabans. When they banned my main account - after I deleted all my comments/posts and then deleted my account mind you, they then undeleted it all so they could ban it - within an hour of signing in to an alt account that had never made a post/comment/upvote/etc, it was also permanently banned.

It's not hard to get around these restrictions and use reddit if you do want to, but I don't want to.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 months ago

Not unless you can prove that it was you that was watching those videos, no.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You didn't prove anything lol. You linked to a far-left biased site.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 months ago

You’ve been patient? 🤣

Bye

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately with RAID you need to basically wipe and start again to add more drives to the array.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 months ago

It definitely can be. This person didn’t have the data anywhere else, so they didn’t have a backup. I use cloud storage as one of my backups.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 9 months ago

Borders? California? They don’t care about borders lol

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 9 months ago

Hiring someone over someone else purely because of their race or sex is discrimination, racism, and/or sexism.

It sounds to me like you’re talking about jobs that illegal immigrants do, especially once you brought up cheap labor. Jobs like those don’t have diversity quotas, because they almost entirely hire from the “diversity” pool.

view more: ‹ prev next ›