FreedomAdvocate

joined 10 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

*arr works just fine with “find something random to watch” if you set it up that way with lists.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah it is, because you can just set it up to automatically download whatever you want if that’s what you prefer. You can just set up lists to watch for content that matches certain criteria. I’m sure there is even one that would mirror Netflix.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 4 days ago

With radarr etc you typically download content and then move and rename it in post processing. You can’t stream it in Plex, as it doesn’t even show up in Plex until after all of this has happened and Plex has scanned the folder.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Of what exactly?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 5 days ago

Also you missed the point of my screenshot there. It wasn’t about the crime, it was about the fact that that person wasn’t even deported.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Immigration didn’t cause the housing crisis, but it’s now the biggest thing making it worse every single day.

We aren’t building enough houses. There being thousands of empty houses is irrelevant because people own them. They’re not on the market. They were empty before the mass immigration started.

There being more people here doesn’t mean more labour to build houses, because we’re not importing builders or even people that are considered “skilled”. Something like 10% of all the immigrants coming here now are “skilled workers”, the rest are their families and students and unskilled workers.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, taxing wealth and assets isn’t the answer. People shouldn’t be punished simply for being successful and owning things.

Your last point is - making corporations actually pay taxes. No more Apple Australia buying iPhones from Apple Scotland for the exact same price they sell them to customers for, meaning no profit in Australia, for example. No more mining giants paying nothing to literally sell the ground out from under us.

Income tax should be abolished, and instead make it spending/usage based. Spend more pay more.

The only thing I agree with “taxing the rich” for is fines - they should be percentage based. $1000 for your passenger having their seatbelt slightly off hurts someone earning $60k a lot more than it hurts someone earning $600k.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 5 days ago (3 children)

That logic is bad because while yes, it’s taxed at a lower rate, you can’t access it until you turn 67!!! If you access it before then you get slugged with a huge tax on it.

It’s like when I see people telling others who are struggling to put food on the table or petrol in the car to make sure they contribute to their own super to the max every year - it’s a stupid idea, yet many of the people who say things like that also think like you do in your post, which makes no sense.

Successful people are already punished enough by the tax man for being good at what they do. Finding more ways to fuck them over isn’t going to end well for our country and economy, as eventually they’ll all up and leave, taking 50% of the countries income tax with them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Fuck ‘em - they need to be taxed more

You say this about the people that pay the majority of all income taxes already lol. When did this commie “successful people should be penalised more and more for being successful!” ideology become so popular in Australia?

No amount of extra tax from the wealthy is going to result in reduced taxes for everyone else. The wealthy and the high earners already pay almost all of the tax. All it’s going to do is end up in more government waste and corruption.

Also……why do they need to be taxed more? Are they using more government services than everyone else? Do they get special roads that only they get to drive on?

view more: ‹ prev next ›