with their dominant gaming position
If only Microsoft ever had that position. They've been distant third since the Switch 1 came out, distant second from day 1 of the PS4.
Strange that two years ago, there was worry that Xbox would take over everything after the Activision-Blizzard merger.
That was never a real concern for anyone who had been paying attention to the video game world for even the last 10 years.
This guy doesn't do it via software.
For his approach, Kim said he was “in essence, just disabling LED with drill.”
There was never any evidence to even suggest that AI was the cause, but as you're on lemmy I'm sure you know that AI is currently blamed for pretty much everything.
No it won't. It can only look at what is on the screen of the person using it.
It also makes no sense to use for multiplayer games.
Already replied to that and showed why you're wrong.
I do DevOps and Software Dev for multi-billion dollar companies btw.
You said this
There are hardware for that called hardware security modules, but yeah I definitely wouldn’t trust Twitter’s implementation - especially because they probably just need the auth team to tell the HSM that the user logged in when they didn’t to get that key
So again - you're just hoping that they've done it wrong, based on nothing other than you wanting them to have done it wrong. They've told you they did, but you don't believe them based on...............nothing........nothing whatsoever......other than your hatred.
Feel free to tell me how your knowledge of cryptography proves that it's done incorrectly though. Please.
Are the houses where the homeless people are?
lol you definitely didn't.
Why are the immich teams internal deployments available to anyone on the open web? If you go to one of their links, like they provide in the article, they have an invalid SSL certificate, which google rightly flags as being a security risk, warns you about it, and stops you from going there without manual intervention. This is standard behaviour and no-one should want google to stop doing this.
I was going to install linux on an old NUC to run immich some time soon, but think I might have to have a look to see if it has been audited by some legit security companies first. How do they not see this issue of their own doing?
Have you seen what browsers say when you have a look at the SSL certificate warning page?
Why is a user made PR publishing a branch to Immich's domain for the user to see?