FriendOfDeSoto

I remember meeting some masquerading Americans during the Iraq war. These were backpackers in SE Asia.

You only show your passport at the border or maybe when you get a car or a hotel room. That leaves a lot of time to pretend being Canadian everywhere else.

That being said, I just saw a comedy bit where this was recommended to Americans. I think it's more meme than happening IRL today.

The premise seems to suggest that the target companies' security measures remain locked in at current levels. So while the attacker models scheme and plan and infiltrate, they do not notice or they do nothing. I don't think that would be realistic.

I also don't think the targeted companies don't already feed all their data into some models. There will be beaches and poorly configured LLMs - the prize won't be as juicy, the impact of the grand conspiracy won't be as big.

I think the sky will not fall here.

They are a bit vague on this but I suspect all of these attack vectors start with LEOs having physical access to the unlocked phone. They then set up a trusted desktop without the phone owners knowing.

Which is clever, to be fair. Whether or not that's legal is already a court case. The law is so frightfully grey.

I don't remember lines in front of stores. I would split the decade roughly into two halves. The first half was one person buying a game that came on 15 floppy disks and a million people of friends and friends of friends and their friends would copy it. The second half was more about CD-ROMs but we figured out how to copy those two. In the background Nintendo was picking up steam and then PS. But for my money console gaming was still a bit of a niche business in the first half for sure. The geeks were excited but it wasn't a mass phenomenon.

People stood in line to buy Windows 95 though. Imagine that. People stood in line waiting to give their money voluntarily to Microsoft. I'm sure there were scalpers there as well. In my memory that was more impactful than any game release.

It's not used in the sense that somebody slept in it. But the packaging seal has been broken because it's a returned item. The risk of lice is manageable.

That's exactly it.

You can discuss any war you like in any forum that will discuss this subject.

The national media wherever you are will discuss certain conflicts and maybe strive others but the attention will really be elsewhere. As humans we have a limited attention span. Until last decade we had outsourced the sorting of importance to editors in newsrooms. With social media it's been a hybrid of editors and algorithms. A lot of algorithms are fed by traditional, trusted news organisations so the biases persist. This is very generalized but I would describe the formula like this: far away, no oil, no business interests? No news.

Also, people like having opinions. But there is also an ignorance level the majority of people will stay under. You'll always have a-holes that just parrot stuff unreflected. They live these days mostly but not exclusively on Xwitter. I'm not talking about those guys. The more level headed will not want to discuss certain things for lack of knowledge.

On Lemmy, you'll find more level headed people that are influenced by biases that persist in the Anglosphere - we speak English after all. Also, people are not willing to walk into wood chippers. There is no comment on the internet that doesn't have the potential to trigger a shit storm.

Journalism is also about narrative. Aung San Suu Kyi's journey from imprisoned freedom fighter to de facto head of government, to looking away from genocide - the hero journey was aborted and with it attention waned. Most white people don't want to look too closely at Africa for fear of finding contemporary conflicts with their roots in the era of colonisation. Since our attention is limited, those are the conflicts we gladly let go of first. Also, we need to stay focused on whether or not an octogenarian shat himself in Washington.

This is not a picture of you, right? Maybe you didn't doxx her but there is really no need to continue this being spread online for a post in this forum.

If by r-word you mean resplendent than have at it! Thank you for rage baiting with us today.

The other ones I mentioned.

That's ucked fup.

China's biggest denomination is CNY 100 or about USD 15. India pulled its largest denomination bill from circulation maybe 5 years ago. The US stopped doing anything above USD 100 a while ago. Bigger denominations are a counterfeit and bribery risk.

Nobody cares about the Swiss Franc in cash outside of Switzerland. There are 10 million or thereabouts Swiss people. All the other currencies are used in much larger populations, three-figure millions at the lower end.