You responded to a law that was not in anyway a part of this case.
You just used the case to express an unrelated opinion. One I happen to agree with. But not this case.
You also used the opertunity to harness and bully someone. With no idea who she is or how she behaves.
This was not libel.
It was workplace harassment. And would also be a issue in the US.
If you actually read what happened. The person that did this was an absolute arsehole.
Filling in a personality test for a 3rd party while she is away. Then announcing your own negative result to all attendies when she arrives. While at an official work event.
Is a clear case of harradement and abuse. The company not responding to this, And the victim feeling the need to resign. Is a valid reason to take it to court.
PS Your response with 0 knowledge of the victim. Make you a bully. Anywhere.
This is an important point.
We have to remember the US already manufacturers most every product outside the US.
In part this means their tarrifs wars are less harmful to Thier own politicians.
It is important to remember companies doing this are still funding US political parties and politicians.
Boycotting coca cola pepsi apple and other US companies that fund the US but make stuff all over the world. Is important.
Then you are an arsehole.
She was attacked in a professional environment. And treated in a bullying way. By someone acting like a bully.
A hostile work environment was created. You are clearly the type of person who should be fired.