Krauerking

joined 2 years ago
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 7 months ago

He really thinks he is king of the world.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

I mean all that PTSD is why America had the prohibition in the first place.
Wives were getting abused by their husbands back from the war and said they seemed on edge and worse than before... So, "it must be the booze and not shellshock cause they are tougher than that".

The world changes and reacts to its new conditions its just a shame people are morons and evil little shits 8 times out of 10.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 17 points 7 months ago

Oh how I long for the sweet bitter taste of ironic onion.

But nope. Way to much actual meat and gristle in this story.
Fuck these people who keep thinking the suffering of others is good for internet engagement.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Rural places get weird, doubly so when they got bored without the internet.

Just ask Pennsylvania. Virginville, Two Lick Valley, Rough and Ready and so much more.

Maybe it's also a dutch influence...

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 7 months ago

And maybe a physicist.

They'd probably like to know. They are very kinky like that.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Damn good find.
Jolly damn good find.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

Visual medium and anything that can cause social distress or economic impact.
That's the basic wording of the bill which allows for a lot of wiggle room but true that we can still write mean things, but that was always subject to libel and then your photo evidence to go with your article can be censored.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 7 months ago

I guess. I have seen her giggle about the need of cheap slave labor.

She's just another capitalist who want her own comfort more than she wants what's best for others.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 8 months ago

Maybe start with voting no on the new censorship bill that just passed with unanimous consent that Trump specifically said he will abuse to silence people.

I mean they have so many options to move in any direction other than their shoulders up in a shrug.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 8 months ago

Yet they are happy to hand the criminal who is actively shooting people another loaded weapon because "optics".

They are the kind of people that say you should stay with a partner that rapes and abuses you because it might make family gatherings weird if you complain.
Fuck those people.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 8 months ago

This reminds me of the DNC super donor Ed Buck who would lure in gay black men and kill them by injecting meth into them while raping them.

He managed to do it for years and wasn't until one of the victims survived to be able talk about it that he was sentenced as with every previous body it was said it was a private issue and a sad loss of a friend.
Photos managed to get shared of his racist, rape, death den helping sway the public.

Ed Buck would have loved this bill and its ability to actively scrub his image further.
If it feels like monsters would like something I don't want it.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 8 months ago

Adding more noise does nothing to add insights it just makes it more exhausting to pick a position yourself.

If everything is nuanced then you can more easily give up on caring in a meaningful way because you believe there is no good answer.

view more: ‹ prev next ›