M1ch431

joined 11 months ago
[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (9 children)

You enslave others by consuming most common products on the shelves. Modern slavery (and child slavery) is more expansive than most know and third-world exploitation is rampant - western supply chains are not immune.

While you support the enslavement of others with your consumption, corporations continue to become more and more powerful.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Let's not kid ourselves. Publicly available information is invasive and a violation of privacy.

We have corporations who have effectively set up mass surveillance networks and they call it "adtech".

There is an entire economy surrounding "publicly available information". There are corporations that act as as data brokers and people search websites that compile way too much sensitive information about private individuals. Newspapers systematically report on events that aren't really of public interest concerning private individuals; e.g. arrest records and these articles hang around forever even if the arrest doesn't result in a conviction or the crime is expunged.

If this was employed by the government or law enforcement, it would absolutely include data that extends far beyond the reaches of publicly available information — and it's worth pointing out that the US has a mass surveillance network in the form of the NSA/PRISM.

There is zero way you could convince me that AI, prone to hallucination, would be well served to predict crime or criminals. Even if it didn't hallucinate, it still wouldn't be possible to predict crime — only potentially anticipate a crime. We aren't 2D characters following a script — anything can happen.

Law enforcement is already very unhinged. Let's not cheerlead the addition of any tools that aid in psychosis to their arsenal.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 23 points 7 months ago (5 children)

This is about as psychotic as governments using AI to predict crimes.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Our produce and ingredients suck here in the US. It's all devoid of nutrition and usually gamed to look better than it actually is. Lots of things taste funny to me, and if it's not flavorless, it tastes like chemicals or metal. There's simply no regulation or oversight.

When I have food that is grown or produced locally (and ethically) or food that is imported from Europe or even Canada, the difference is stark — I feel like I can actually digest and the flavor is night and day.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If I was there, if I was involved in law enforcement, if I had access to the crime scene and raw footage and evidence, I might be able to speculate. Armchair speculation is insufficient for me.

There are plenty of events that raise legitimate questions and concerns - like suspicious, high profile deaths that are immediately ruled as suicide. Everybody is free to hold their own positions and perspectives as far as I am concerned. Question on, sate your concern and curiosity, you'll get no arguments against that from me.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Of course, a true conspiracy unfolds because the masses are unaware. The masses are gaslit if they start catching on.

But in the absence of compelling evidence, it's pointless to wildly speculate about from my perspective.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Thanks for the response, I enjoyed reading it and our sentiment largely aligns.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I caught on to his bullshit pretty quick when he came into the public eye - before his stroke. Is there a lot of evidence pointing to his past misconduct?

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not making an argument for chemtrails. It's pointless to speculate about, there is no evidence or smoking gun.

I'm just suggesting that we be kind and empathetic towards individuals that do believe these sorts of things. Is it out of character for the US government? Nah, not really.

Many of these people probably were living in or around 1969. In their lived reality, the US government was doing shit like this. Have things really gotten better?

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

These are the people voting Trump in, dude, you cant actually be this dense

Of course these individuals share responsibility for potentially voting for him, but we ALL share responsibility for him rising to power.

No, but I do try to make the world a less stupid place when I can

We don't need to call out stupidity to make it a better place. Expressing yourself with clarity and confidence of thought is infinitely better.

If they’re too stupid to learn basic science then I reeeeally don’t care

You don't need to care about any of this.

Ok? They’re also very stupid individuals, I don’t care at all what makes them believe the blatantly stupid thing, only that they refuse to accept reality

If somebody you love is frightened (in a general sense), what would you do? Calming them down and helping to see the truth would be one potential path to ease their suffering. What would making fun of them do?

You’re doing an awful lot of defending of people who are choosing to behave the way they do, it’s weird. Gonna file you in with them and call it a day, you don’t seem to be too far from them in the ol’ comprehension skill

Do what you want, I'm not going to apologize for my behavior or take it personally. If my crime is being too empathetic, guess I'm guilty.

view more: ‹ prev next ›