Daily reminder for what this independent stands for. She is a big L Liberal who just happens to believe in climate change and that queer people exist.
I'm not sure I can agree - using your own source, here are the people which her votes most closely aligned with, in descending order:
| Agreement | Name | Party / Electorate |
|---|---|---|
| 97% | Zoe Daniel | Independent Representative for Goldstein |
| 94% | Kylea Tink | Independent Representative for North Sydney |
| 94% | Sophie Scamps | Independent Representative for Mackellar |
| 92% | Zali Steggall | Independent Representative for Warringah |
| 92% | Allegra Spender | Independent Representative for Wentworth |
| 92% | Kate Chaney | Independent Representative for Curtin |
| 91% | Helen Haines | Independent Representative for Indi |
| 81% | Andrew Wilkie | Independent Representative for Clark |
| 79% | Max Chandler-Mather | Australian Greens Representative for Griffith |
| 77% | Dai Le | Independent Representative for Fowler |
| 77% | Elizabeth Watson-Brown | Australian Greens Representative for Ryan |
| 76% | Stephen Bates | Australian Greens Representative for Brisbane |
| 75% | Adam Bandt | Australian Greens Representative for Melbourne |
Slightly below that are 95% of current/former ALP members ranging from 62% to 42% in one almost-contiguous block, with 95% of current/former LNP members below that at 40% to 18% in another almost-contiguous block. If her voting record was just LNP + [climate change / queer people existing] then these numbers don't make sense.
There look to be (based on this source) several other policy areas that aren't in the bucket of [climate change / queer people existing] where she's voted progressively. I don't think judging based on a single policy is the right way to accurately classify political leanings here.
edit: softened language slightly because I was just broody about something unrelated to this thread when I first replied
If the majority of her voting positions* don't align with "big L liberals" then it seems an inaccurate way to classify her, even if she's not voting progressively on some key things like workers rights etc. Social and environmental issues (which is a significantly expanded scope compared to the previously stated subsets of just [climate change + queer people existing]!) covers a lot of important policy areas.
Given that her voting record seems to be unambiguously and substantially more progressive than any of the LNP members I glanced at, it would be more accurate to describe her record as broadly-progressive-except-in-X.
* relying on this source - I don't know whether this generalizes accurately to her actual voting or not, but I'm assuming it's at least decently accurate