MacNCheezus

joined 1 year ago
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

The author is looking for a monitor replacement.

Yes, and he's not wrong, as that appears to be the primary use case for these glasses. For full AR, you still need the Beam Pro, which costs half of the price of the glasses alone.

I do love Snow Crash (it was one of my favorite novels growing up), but I think Google Glass was probably much closer to that vision than these are. Personally, all I want is a big fucking screen fixed in space before me that doesn't make me dizzy when I look at it for more than 5 minutes, or wear out my neck muscles too much because the headset is too heavy.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Right, I have a 1600p laptop screen as well and the resolution downgrade was noticeable. What you say about the projection makes sense, unfortunately I haven't seen any specs for the micro OLED displays they use, they only claim that the virtual screen has 1080p, which might be achievable if the displays DO in fact have a higher vertical resolution. It DOES appear that they've increased the size of the displays from 0.55" to 0.68" but there's no information on the native resolution that I can find.

If I saw these glasses in a store somewhere I'd probably try them out but they'd have to be VASTLY better than the ones I tried to convince me to buy them.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I tried a previous incarnation of these and was not impressed. The screen was too dark in bright rooms and the resolution and image sharpness was lacking. Also the response time was rather slow, which made them basically unusable for playing games or watching (which was primarily what I bought them for). Additionally, the virtual screen was not fixed in space but moved around when you moved your head, which gave me vertigo after prolonged use. I ended up returning them after a week.

It appears as if these are at least the second, if not third generation (mine were simply called Air), and the spatial processing chip might help alleviate some of these issues, but I'm disappointed to see that the vertical resolution has not been increased. But at 32:9, it seems that these have twice the horizontal resolution, which would equal two 16:9 screens next to each other.

I wonder if these might be worth giving another try, but I'm loathe to risk it as my Amazon account has been flagged for returning too many purchases before.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago

Next post, AI makes fun of user for not knowing how to code

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

AI wiLl tAkE oUr jObS