as an unremarkable captain of an unremarkable country on the fascist side of WWII (why him?)
there weren’t a ton of capable and experienced officers back then in the army.
This seems like a great answer to "why him?"
I don’t see the point that is trying to be made here
A common anti-communist narrative is that communist governments are not actually popular. The main point of highlighting CIA involvement with various "popular" opposition groups is that this narrative is heavily astroturfed.
A secondary point is that all the anti-communist stories about repression and show trials should be read in the light that yes, a hostile foreign government was in fact working with your domestic opposition groups to try to overthrow your government.
When have U.S. troops fought against imperialism?
And if you're hanging your hat on (reluctantly) being on the right side of one war 80 years ago, it's time for a hard look in the mirror.