Melvin_Ferd

joined 2 years ago
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I mean are you asking it if there is a history of an idiom existing or just what the idiom could mean?

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

God damit this sentence makes me want to blow my brains out. It's too fucking thick in bullshit. You ever notice how the right will just call someone a pedo or gang member and that really works. It's not like they go " he's just socioeconomic poverty based victim of modern prison system" like just get to that point. Andrew is a grown man who targets children.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it should. It fixes a lot of issues. There's enough wealth out there that this concept could actually work. Any thriving nation should have a universal basic income to prevent all its citizens from succumbing to poverty. What' do you think are the cons here?

The argument against is understandable. If you quickly look at it's clearly a misappropriation of tax dollars. But hear me out on this. What if at the end of the day is costing the same if not less to fund this program.

With ubi you can get rid of a lot of government waste and all the administration that comes with each of those other programs. Social security, welfare, programs focused on poverty, subsidy. They're all gone and the costs to fund these massive departments.

There's also an argument that addiction and mental health epidemic is worsened by poverty. By providing people with basic needs we can reduce suffering massively. This benefits everyone.

It also encourages entrepreneurs. People will have more ability to take risks with their ideas. No longer would starting a business be isolated to trust fund kids and people with strong safety nets.

It helps solve the problem of AI risking other people's jobs. This makes it easier for us to fully adopt new technology and automation helping the country to be competitive in this new area without fear of increasing poverty.

Just look at recent events. Having all this wealth concentrated on the hands of guys who review pizza places or these Dynasty's that go back generations is not benefiting us. They play with the lives of everyone so casually that it creates a lot of suffering and we still lose all that wealth and get nothing for it. Watching the way these billionaires casually lose millions over the past few months and not care while they argue that they can't even be taxed has opened my eyes to a lot of things.

Our countries are suffering and dying out because wealth stealing it's concentration by the upper crust of all our nation's. It's not immigrants. It's not politicians. It's not the drug users. It's the upper class stealing from us.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree fully. This would be the single greatest thing we could do.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Having kids changed my view. Originally I believed nature influenced our gender roles. Since having kids I have seen in my kids and others that there are clear differences in how both boys and girls interact with the world and both are pretty incredible to watch. I think maybe the idea that being more stoic and less emotional is ok.

Saying all that, there are definitely cultural influences that can take these inherent traits to toxic levels.

I'd like to see studies showing when kids are left to their own that they will trend towards non traditional gender based toys. My gut is believing that this may not need proof that girls and boys do not experience emotions with similar intensity.

One thing I think is a clear difference is attention to details between men and women. What I worry is that if we start thinking men and women are more similar than they are we could run into problems when average people wrongly assume the other experiences things they do.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I think it's in our nature.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Now print it out and poster it around town.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ exaggerating what I said like talking to a trump voter

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yea but now we do. And not every one did survive

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yea what's your point. That's basic understanding of getting information from anywhere. LLM Excel at querying information using human language. If I'm stuck trying to remember some obscure thing on the tip of my tongue and all I have to go off of is the color of a shirt, the accent and general time period then LLM beat everything out of the water in speed to get me the correct answer

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Are you suggesting that people on the left should abandon all these new powerful technologies to the right. We're in a capitalist society. You're suggesting "fuck it" and leave only right leaning consumers for these powerful new products.

What the hell. It's getting too be so hard to be on the left. Some of the most ineffective strategies on the planet. It looks like it's a doomed political group. There's no forethought.

This suggestion was just as bad as people saying don't use AI

We have to use it and we have to adopt it. Stop giving up powerful tools, technology and space to the right. I'm getting to be so done with the left if they just continue to shit the fucking bed.

view more: next ›