Nosavingthrow

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Stalling... what am I stalling? What are you talking about, man? Seems like you have plenty of time to waste. Oh well, I guess you're not a very serious, introspective person.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My kind? What does that even mean? You've spent just over a day replying to me. You clearly have the time. I feel like a broken record, but why are other people obligated to put in the effort that you aren't?

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Like I said, man, you demand sources while offering none. Who are you to demand from others what you do not provide? Just some guy. Certainly, you can't think that is persuasive or even a valuable use of your time?

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

And we're back to you demanding things from people. You provide sources whe YOU make a claim. So, I guess we'll see how that works for you.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

My man, I'm not commenting on any specific fact. You demanded sources up and down in these replies, but you then also insist everyone google your claims. That is certainly one of the techniques of all time.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

What the fuck are you on about? I'm commenting on your demand for sources while also providing none for numerous claims. Interesting strategy. You must have studied Plato.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

'Source for thee, but none for me' is an interesting rhetorical strategy. Let's see how it works out.