If it's just one thing probably mind reading.
Oskolki
joined 1 month ago
How can someone be okay with exploitation and be considered socially progressive?
Long term plan of USA is literally to absorb everyone within it, by basically Darwinism, those who make it at the top are deemed worthy as rulers of the world. Like literally the end point of USA is one big World Government where everyone is the same and people are sorted into different groups based on their genetics. Eventually through Darwinism and Technological Advancement as well as assumed abundance of resources, they envision a Utopia where everyone is free to live the perfect life they choose, secured by a government that makes sure nobody interferes with each other in ways that break boundaries and cause irritation. It'll essentially be a world without workers, fully automated and enjoyable, without struggle.
And this is considered socially progressive.
There are only two reasons to oppose Liberals:
- You don't believe it'll work out.
- You don't want it to work out, you want the world to stay as it is.
If you sincerely believe in their ideals and goals you're essentially working towards a Utopia, anything can be justified for such a goal.
Where's the Ethics Committee when you need them.
Uhm, you're gonna have to figure out how this is able to generate profit, if you want me to implement this feature. 
Have you heard of 300?
Has a nice rhyme with a tractorist