PRIMEcavitationfetishist

joined 5 days ago
[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bad faith slopper lies. Why bother to copy-paste? What are you using to generate BTW.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

how is summary at the top of page different from first result

Okay you can't be discussed with. Am I even talking to a human being? Are you asking grok for arguments? Arguing with sloppera is pointless. Everything it's saying is disingenuous missing the point or shows fabulous ignorance.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Searching

This used to be a bare bones version of what you could do on literally every search engine. I had a high school class about this. 50/50 whether you got a 'business' teacher who didn't know how to open PDF or the librarian who'd go on digressions about information theory and optimal solutions.

In the late 2010s google followed immediately by other large search engines started removing these features and actively showing users worse results so they would do more searches and get shown more ads.

Your shit won't fly here, slopper.

Sloppers are like enemies of the concept of truth just for it's own sake, which is a bizzaire level of evil I never expected to see.

Asses are cute sometimes. They can also be great for sex!

Neither virtue possessed by "ai" search results.

And I bet those 10% were willing to opt in. Fucking sloppers incapable of giving a shit about truth. They want to kill the very concept. They're literally enemies of truth. Even fucking skeletor didn't hate the fucking concept of truth.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That's relative to the confidence with which its presented. Ten results on a page? I dunno. Only one of them needs to fit, and I can refine my search or check page two.. Or used to be able to, before they disabled those features.

A statement at the top of the page? Pretty fucking low. Variable depending on topic, some as low as 0%.

Get fucked sloppy. You're ruining the world and replacing critical infrastructure for the sake of dystopian bullshit that might collapse at any moment. You're going to have been cheer leading it along. I hope you end up homeless and hungry-a lot of other people will, but you'll fucking deserve it.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's no problem with 'last gen' right now. The "ai" bullshit and global rise of fascism has slowed tech progress to a crawl, and even ten or fifteen year old systems are pretty good right now.

Plus, you're making this or drafting tables.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's the idea behind democracy. That is indeed why it works.

The representatives are a check on the will of the people from the aristocrats established interests and large institutions. Way to make sure they don't get too egalitarian. This is literally what its for.

I do believe the lever isn't strong enough here, and some part of it will break. They aren't very smart. We have forgotten how to interface with reality. At best it's a roll 0f the dice, at worst its Eddington.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Its wrong though. Its wrong so fucking often. There's no way to fix that. I stopped using ddg because of this. Pandering to right wing idiots does not necessarily mean being smart, that's thatcherite Nazi coddling lies.

I would kneel, and tell him to board with an honorific.

Still too low, and many would never fine corporate person.

view more: ‹ prev next ›