Rhaedas

"If there’s anything I can’t stand, it’s a smart owl."

That's sounds like a done deal then, and he knows what he wants. Honestly, as a parent that's all you can ask for.

Not designed, but trained. Training involves rewarding finding answers, so they WILL give you something. "I don't know" is not going to fare well in the training development, so it naturally gets filtered out, while very creative (but wrong) LLMs do well.

It's hard to let them go, but they have to live their own life, and you hopefully did the best you could to give them the tools they will need to succeed. Look at it this way, making such a move early in life lets them sample what else is out there, and no reason they can't either come back or move on to something else entirely, now armed with two different culture experiences. So much better than being trapped in one place or maybe worse, settling for that, and not see other places at all.

I guess the real question is why is he making the choice. Current conditions in the US? Her? A bit of both? Or maybe he's gotten a sample of AU and likes what he saw. As long as it's a good reason(s), and they all are, then why not?

This is exactly what a President, an elected service worker sworn to protect the rights of the public, should be doing.

Not.

Crusade (Babylon 5 spinoff)

Many people here have posted the link to Climate Town's video on expiration dates, but your comment also brings into focus a video of theirs about consumer waste. Actually he's probably made a few on that subject, but the one that came to mind was about the circle of buying and returning products (eg. Amazon returns), and what really happens. Good lord, the waste.

Safe drivers are just that, no matter how they park. If your visibility is bad when you park front in, then either you're hauling something that's blocking your line of sight (in which case it would make sense), or your vehicle has terrible visibility, which is far too many of them.

Park how you want to park. I've never had a problem backing out of a space.

The math and physics problems of SDI (Reagan's Star Wars) hasn't changed. I guess this is yet another lesson of history we've forgotten, even though so many in the political realm were around then.

I think Meta and others went open with their models as firewall protection against legal action due to their blatant stealing of people's work to train with. If the models has stayed commercial and controlled within the company, they could be (probably still wouldn't be, but could be) forced to shut down or start over properly. But it's far too late now since it's everywhere there is a GPU running, even if models don't progress past current state.

That being said, not much is getting done about the safety factors. Yes, they are only LLMs and not AGI, but there's commonality in regards to not being sure what's going on inside the box and if it's really doing what it's told to do. Now is the time boundaries and research should be done, because once something happens (LLM or AGI) it's too late. So what do I want to see happen? Heavy regulation and transparency on the leading edge of development. And stop the madness of more compute being the only solution with its environmental effects. It might be the only solution, but companies are going that way because it's the easiest way to throw money at a problem and reap profits, which is all they care about.

And there is the motive. I did not guess it was a used car salesman.

To be fair, the Air Force will be stripping it down as they modify it for the needs of the office. But all it takes is one thing missed to be a huge problem. This just isn't a great idea at all, but they knew he'd jump at it because hey, free plane that he gets to keep.