TheStaffmaster

joined 1 week ago

Sadly toyotas and Hondas are outliers in this area. Owned A 15' Venza until it got t boned this winter. still a bit cheezed about that. GREAT car, BTW. 110% recommend if you find a used one with low miles.

wait till I tell you about refried beans

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In the 1990's you could look in the Uncle Henry's and get a decent used car for like $300. you'd register it, and it would last you a few years until it was too expensive to fix, (or it wouldn't pass state inspection) then you'd move on. In the early 2000's you could look on craigslist and find a decent used car for $500. Same deal. But by the time the housing bubble burst, I came to the realization that whatever the price of the car was, it would cost you $3,000 at the end of the day just to get it up and running. By the end of the 20 Teens, that number was $5k, and side of the road sales were junk that the seller knew was about to be REALLY EXPENSIVE to fix so wanted out from under it. These days, don't buy used from a private seller unless it's a collectable: the car is a money pit and they know it. This is one of those things where the auto industry enshittified to kill the resale market. Now they are starting subscriptions for features you used to get as standard. the infuriating thing is that the tech exists to build a car that will last 30-40 years, little major maintenance, but "it's not profitable," so they won't.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not saying people are not entitled for recognition as the the perpetuators and propagators (there's a better word,but it escapes me at the moment) of innovative ideas and designs, nor am I suggesting that they not be allowed to profit on those assets, ither tangible or conceptual. Where the line should be drawn is when those ideas become so cosmopolitan in their reach as to be necessary for existence. A few things do exist that fit this bill already, the Internet itself being one of them. One company or government may own the servers it resides on, but as a concept nobody can "own" the internet, just as no one can "own" the ocean, or a holy text, or "own" an experience (the set dressing and location perhaps, but not YOUR feelings and reactions, which are unique to YOU.)

This is a philosophy that imposes a faustian bargain to success in business: the larger your business, the less it belongs to YOU. If your business is all encompassing, (such as in a monopoly), it ceases to even be yours AT ALL.

Not trying to argue, merely provide more context.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that they expected it to eclipse real people AT ALL is both telling and slightly disturbing.

 

I was thinking that, as it applies to Intellectual Property mostly, there comes a point at which a service or idea gains such traction and ubiquity in it's use or implementation by humanity as a whole, that to apply any form of creative control or ownership to it is morally wrong, on philosophical grounds. This could also apply to physical objects as well. In short it's the concept that Total Ubiquity defeats Copywrite and Patent as a matter of course. If said thing requires upkeep, it is not a thing that CAN be "owned" but rather operated in stewardship.

I feel in our current Late-Stage Capitalist quagmire this might be a controversial proposal, so I wanted to bounce it off of some other people to get their take on it as an idea, and if there are any similar philosophies like it (other than communism, obviously).

I got to thinking about it after landing on the Google start page and coming to the realization that so much of our world relies on what Google provides that for one corporation to be in sole control of it is a security risk in of itself. I understand I'm probably preaching to the choir here, so try to be objective in your answers please, but don't feel the need to censor yourself either. Thanks, I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm more the guy behind the pink one

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I like to drive about 20 over on long hauls, so technically "I'm passing." PERMANENTLY

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and the weed was better too. That might just be the high tolerance speaking though.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when the 1900's were called the "20th century?" Pepperridge farm remembers.

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hyper capitalism of the 1980's would be considered quant, by today's standards

[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think it was around 2014, but it's been a slow downhill ever since. I used to visit many sites in my nightly rounds, but it became just Imgur, YouTube, Reddit, and NewGrounds, for the most part around then. I just lost Reddit to a perm Suspension, and I swore of Imgur after it got to woke to post jokes and dark humor/observations. (and they IP banned me for 6 months)

view more: next ›