TwistyLex

joined 2 years ago
[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I absolutely support this response. The US shouldn't be allowed to swing its military might around to extort or absorb its neighbors. That said, it absolutely will and I hope it pays dearly for it.

[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

I'm gonna be brutally honest here: unless it's possible to reverse climate change impacts, the US was always going to invade and annex Canada. Even if we had a string of only progressive Presidents leading up to that point. The southern half of our country is about to become agriculturally useless and nearly uninhabitable. The only place for the US to go is north.

[–] TwistyLex@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I see a lot of concern in this thread that future TVs would just peer-to-peer or cellular connect to do their dastardly functions. Wouldn't this be preventable by putting a fine wire mesh around the box on the rear of the panel? Sure, the signal could still go out through the panel, but that's bound to incur a lot of interference from the panel itself, right?