Ulrich

joined 4 months ago
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 5 hours ago

Thank you for proving my point.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago

Youtubers are like celebrities

Do you think celebrities aren't influential? I mean that's how Trump became President. He had zero prior political experience.

Has PewDiePie done anything significant to help make a better change?

Doesn't matter if it's better or worse, the point is that he's influential. He's one of the largest YouTubers on the platform. But regardless, I would say that yes, he has, as in the video in the OP. Not just a Linux video, but a positive and comprehensive one.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

It's long past being meaningless at this point, other than just a red flag of a toxic individual.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Same reason we have to care about literally anything Trump does or says: he's influential. Just in this case, it's a good influence.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (9 children)

Linux = Freedom, customizability MacOS = Usability Windows = ???

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Sentiment analysis on the conversation you were having?

Among other things, sure. More simply, keyword analysis.

Remember semantically aware models are still fairly new and even they lack the context for a particular field of text.

All of these "models" are useless garbage but it doesn't stop them from trying to absolutely cram them everywhere they can.

Unnecessary

None of what they do is "necessary". They could just ask you what your relevant interests are and you could tell them, but they do it anyway. They go to great lengths for any seemingly insignificant amount of data they can get their hands on.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 18 hours ago

Both of these apps have device-level notifications to let you know when an app is listening. I promise they're not. There was a service a while back that was claiming this in their advertising and it went public and their partners all scattered like flies. No one wants to be associated with that sort of thing. It's unnecessary anyway.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

you'd have to store and process hours and hours of audio data that didn't tell us much

I mean that could be solved as simply as a local transcription service...

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Screen recording site

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's illegal if antitrust action is anticipated

That seems like something that would be difficult to prove.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I hardly think $27.5k could be considered "jacking up the price" but I also don't appreciate advertising pricing that is dependent on a government incentive that may not even exist when the vehicles are actually delivered.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I've always wondered, is this illegal? Like obviously it is if they've already been subpoenaed or something.

view more: next ›