Thank you
None of this was true of copilot for years, but I stand corrected as for the current state of affairs
Thank you
None of this was true of copilot for years, but I stand corrected as for the current state of affairs
GitHub copilot is not chatgpt
I stand corrected thank you for sharing
I was commenting based on anecdotal experience and I didn't know where was a test specifically for this
I do notice that o3 is more overconfident and tends to find a source online from some forum and treat it as gospel
Which, while not correct, I would not treat as hallucination
I'm not familiar with the term
What makes this a bullshit take? Focusing attention on actual problems is a great way to make progress
Please articulate why the premise of my argument is fundamentally flawed
No that is not how reasoned debate works, you have to articulate your argument lest you're just sloppily babbling talking points
I think I'm on board with arguing against how LLMs are being owned and managed, so I don't really have much to say
Basically no. What you're calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You'll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all
What exactly is the argument?
Stoic desire to be informed and to be a force of good for others with like intentions