anzo

They're the same picture (:

Oh, I see. That definition gives me a new perspective... I always thought of it as ableism.. before online spaces, and even before the word ableism came to my life. As a kid, I always heard that using retarded as an insult was wrong.

I guess I will have to add this to my todo list, right after invention of time travel ;p hehe. Imagine a kid quoting the dictionary to an adult.

In any case, your comment stays and my person has learned something new for moderation, beyond this terminology.. the context is very important. I actually felt like removing the comment would have been wrong. It seemed your words were too harsh but still, they were going for a point, without raw intent to insult or carry any ad hominem fallacy. I see my instinct was right :) hooray!

Oh, this is not about the top level comment anymore. Zd9 replied one positive use of AI. Not to demeanor the negative sides by that, only to put a fact on the table. Then you came in... the discussion now shifted into.. this. I am no longer engaging, sorry. I didn't mean to discuss at all, only wanted to help u see how the conversation was about you not understanding something... It's there, your downvoted comment.

Please replace retarded with another word so that I don't have to remove your comment for ableism (it has been reported.) Thanks!

I think you're the one wrong. You were accusing zd9 to be defending diffusion models and LLMs. So they said: yes, I am precisely using those and not just any other machine learning algorithm. Yet, you didn't seem to understand... or you're just really unable to see yourself as being incorrect? :/

Oh yeah I meant to say that some sciences have origins that predate empiricism itself. Astronomy for example. Also, some may argue that not all sciences are rooted on evidence in the same way (e.g. positivism would call psychoanalysis a pseudoscience even though there're powerful conclusions that were drown without evidence and have helped people).

Actually, all hypothesis start with a certain lack of evidence. Some hold for their own value, as potential explanations... Yes, O am not talking about maths anymore but about all sciences. For example many subatomic particles that are investigated by CERN. That's why I believe your approach was shortsighted.

Can we really separate maths and physics? I don't think so. Also, is empiricism the appropriate way to define sciences? Isn't that a modern shortsightedness??

Sounds great. Who's stefano? Since I don't know them and the source code is not published yet I am uncertain about this.

And can you explain what's the lighthouses method to bypass NAT? Never heard of it. Seems like the model for this app is p2p-like more than "strict self-host" (similar to scuttlebutt and other projects), am I right?

Great headline, a failure for both companies. Haha! Yeah, I am a cynic and dislike canonical

I'm sure you can find better examples... Not only is a small time window, it also seems to me is more to do with tooling on each environment than your actual IT.

New cyber defense tech. Just read the post ;)