aramova

joined 3 months ago
[–] aramova@infosec.pub -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And so we won't fix the real problem and just react.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It works on some Samsung devices. The entire reason it doesn't work on more devices is because the manufacturers don't release the kernel source. Or did you miss that in the docs?

Better question is, why would the courts not order the kernels to be open for open firmwares?

"Let's order a for-profit company to eliminate their profit method, and ignore the actual problem" is a specialty of ignorant courts... And commenters.

So the courts, instead of addressing the real problem of phone makers only making hardware that for-profit partners can write software for, they just order the for-profit software makers to... remove the profit?

The fuck kind of ass-backwards thinking is that?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 13 points 3 weeks ago

Hey, can America borrow your courts for a bit S. Korea?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

Erdogan wants to be Trump so damn bad. Or vice-versa?

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago

Oh man article 4 is getting spicy.

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't worry so much about monitoring the phone, signal does a good job.

I'd be more worried that they weren't just given the convo or managed to lift the multi-device QR willingly or subserviently.

view more: ‹ prev next ›