Coincidentally, they are wrong (the guns were legally owned), but it doesn't even matter. They're coming into a grieving community to sarcastically troll about US gun legislation using some ridiculous strawman argument.
So they can get fucked.
Coincidentally, they are wrong (the guns were legally owned), but it doesn't even matter. They're coming into a grieving community to sarcastically troll about US gun legislation using some ridiculous strawman argument.
So they can get fucked.
Horrific. This is horrible, I hope the ambulance are able to help all the wounded. It's important that we do what we can, as a community, to help support those affected.
The heroic response from those around, including citizens and the police, probably saved many lives, and it's important that we recognise their courage.
Police media have confirmed to the ABC that 10 people have died in this evening's shooting at Bondi Beach, including one of the shooters and nine victims.
Twelve people were also injured, including multiple police officers responding to the incident.
A second shooter is among the injured, and is in custody.
When the day comes that we are finally forced to take a video selfie:



On the bright side, hopefully the social media giants cop some big fines.
It's refreshing when an article can just write:
This is false.
, and then, of course, prove it.
In fact, highly recommend reading the article. It's a simple, firm breakdown of Segal's job requirements and proof that they are not being fulfilled.
I'm glad to hear the Senate is actually asking about this blatant, public misuse of office. It would be trivially easy for Segal to have just pretended to do the job and put out a statement against the literal, self-declared neo-Nazis making public speeches at their March for Australia events. And even simpler to score an easy win to denounce the high-profile neo-Nazi flash mob explicitly targeting Jewish people. But the message is loud and clear - Jillian Segal's job isn't to combat antisemitism.
Segal is paid over $1,000 a day in a position costing taxpayers over $1 million a year.
No, they are not Live-Action Role Players (well, not primarily). They are violent chauvinists with large amounts of funding and increasing connection with the electoral right-wing, intentionally organising to harm whoever they consider to be undesirable (non-Europeans, progressives, etc.). They're pathetic outcasts, you're absolutely right, but they cannot be trivialised as just roleplaying.
Many of them are recruited by the NSN targeting vulnerable, alienated young men. They have even been discovered trying to get jobs in the NDIS with the open intention of working only with young men diagnosed with autism.
edit: more info - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo2xBrImsg4
The good news is we only hear about the ones who got greed enough to get caught (/s?)
Using science to fund science!
Not wholesome but also interesting: I recall a Russian mafia managed to acquire an Australian slot machine, and reverse engineer it to discover the psuedo-random number generator was effectively a huge but finite list of random numbers, in order, that would just loop back around to the start once it reached the end of the list. So they developed a simple phone app to put in operatives' pockets, and record the spins (e.g. a cherry-cherry-apple spin might be swiping up-up-left). After a few of these, the app would figure out where in the list the machine was currently at, and the app would vibrate whenever the next one was going to be a winning spin, so they could bet higher amounts on them.
I suppose Red Flag are claiming the tactics used are why it's not broadly supported? I'm not sure.
Where does one get anti-fascist combat training? I don't know about any projects in Australia, apart from possibly LIFT Collective in Melbourne. There are probably a few affinity groups without internet presence rather than open organisations, maybe a SHARP might know.
Contrast with other countries with loud and proud red gyms and open martial community defense projects like 0161.
Here is a copy of the censure motion (25 November 2025) which explains why they believe the censure was necessary. It's a short read, and explains that it wasn't just about the stunt:
https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/EEC94CC7AC00476E9A80D151BD9CB504.ashx
Articles report the motion passed 55 votes to 5 (90%+) so it's fair to say this represents the parliament's standards.
I think that's their point - the Zionist movement intentionally tries to conflate Israel with Jewish people and with Judaism. For example, criticism of the country Israel and pro-Palestinean actions have generally been framed by Zionist groups as an attack on Jewish people, rather than an attack on a country and its actions.
This uses Jewish people as a shield for the actions of Zionism, and encourages antisemitism as a result. When some mass media news, social media influencers and racist agitators (e.g. neo-Nazis) all try to associate regular Jewish locals with the atrocities of Israel, this scapegoating puts all Jewish people (even those who are anti-Israel) in danger of indiscriminate attack.