greyfrog

joined 1 week ago
[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Then kick them out of your countries. Leave NATO.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Sadly the whole of the EU is complicit then. We all depends on US protection.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure you haven't read the article.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes, and how did the UK defend this bases that were hit?

Logic?

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 hours ago

Have you read any of your comments?

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works -4 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

In what way are we on the US's side?

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago

You've still not managed to state now we are defending the US. We are defending ourselves.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The US turned on us a long time ago. Our PM has been very clear that the attack on Iran is not legal.

Iran has already launched a missile towards Cyprus. Tell me, how were they involved?

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

Huh? No one is angry about that. It is state media. But it's independent even if the Tories did try and make it less so.

The issue is that most people associate "state media" with it being controlled by the state.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works -2 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

We are absolutely not defending the US. Think about it. Why would the world's largest military need the UK to defend them?

The UK is stopping Iran firing missiles are countries that aren't involved.

[–] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works -3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

What am I missing here? The UK is just saying to Iran don't fire missiles at countries that haven't been involved in firing missiles at you.

That's sensible.

view more: next ›