guismo

joined 1 year ago
[–] guismo@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Looking at his comment history, he manage to be hated even in technical posts, plus everything else.

Apparently some people are really just naturally like that, no financial incentive required. I can't understand why.

Or he's really just a troll and doesn't even believe what he says. He just enjoy the many posts that follow his comments.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's just odd. What's your reason? Why only China? I see you sprinkle some Russia but it's mostly China. Are you that afraid of them?

For instance, I hate israel, because it's an invasion and genocidal and in the last 50 years they probably killed millions. I hate them a lot. And yet I post more varied stuff than you and some other people like you. So what's the reason?

It almost look like this state sponsored bullshit your posts talk about, but it's hard to believe Americans or who knows what would pay someone to post on Lemmy.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Checking your post history, you realy, really hate China right?

You made it your life purpose to only post this kind of stuff. A committed person for sure.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's kind of a joke. Their behaviour is predatory and in a decent society that would not be allowed.

I think profit from real estate should be illegal. At the very least from the land you bought. Not sure about what was constructed. But probably not either.

No one should be allowed to sell a land for more than they paid, considering inflation, etc. No one should be allowed to get land to profit. You may b profit from the use of the land maybe, but NEVER from the land itself, be it renting, selling, whatever. Land is not a product you make. It's limited and existed before you.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I didn't say that. I said that after all investors are dead, then we can start looking into immigration. But it's quite possible that the real estate issue would be solved and I would have a house and we would find out that immigration was not a problem.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I mean you'll see more people resonating with your opinion there. Here you will be bashed. Potentially with good reasons.

I believe in supply and demand yes, and I don't believe real estate follows that. It's a game and those who know how to play and have better resources win.

As mentioned here, there is the COVID example. I don't find your explanation credible. "People" (if I can use the term for those who benefited from the pandemic) didn't get rich so quickly for your explanation to make sense.

What I do remember, not what I think, was people complaining everywhere that they couldn't find workforce. I remember a lot of chaos that happened directly because the immigrants were gone.

Other than that, I'm not an "investor" and I would never be. So I can't debate that. I do know that investors (I know quite a few of them) are the cancer of society and their death would directly benefit everyone, probably also solving the real estate issue and I would be able to buy a house since anyone wanting to profit from that would worry about being murdered.

That's my personal opinion on the subject. After all investors are killed, then we can start checking if immigrants are a problem and try to solve it. But it's probably a somewhat radical opinion.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Your opinion is very popular on reddit. You should check it out.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Because they own the media. Or they are the ones the media wants to please.

Seeing TV on the gym always make me wonder who the hell makes that content and who the hell is meant to consume it.

Are all the viewers real estate agents, house owners paying for renovation or people on yatch trips? I don't see a single normal person on those shows.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I think I agree with the message, if I can understand it. But it looks as if you were having a stroke writing it. It's pretty hard to understand.

1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by guismo@aussie.zone to c/linuxphones@lemmy.ca
 

I hope it's ok to post on this community. It seems to be the most active. Skip to the summary at the end if you are in a hurry.

Every time the issue with google's dick move come up, I barely see any mention to Jolla/SailfishOS. Why is this not the Linux phone that we should be supporting?

I bought an Xperia way back in 2018 I think, and bought their community support and installed. It was usable. I ended up giving up on it because it was much worse than the ungoogled android alternative back then. The GPS took a long time to work, a lot of stuff was rough.

And some things were great surprises that comes with using a Linux phone. Syncthing android wouldn't install, but then I just installed the normal Linux Syncthing like normal and it worked perfectly!

But now with google killing F-droid and such, even a rough Sailfish will be a better option. I didn't stop using it because it was unusable, but because open source android was better. Open source android will die, and Sailfish must have gotten better by now.

So why isn't it an option? One thing I heard people complaining is that they are charging yearly for updates. Is this the problem?

People, even the very rich and evil microsoft gave up on investing in their windows phones. And those massive companies can only do so by profiting a lot from personal data. Any company will need a massive investment to be an option. Specially until it gains traction, with a small user base, it MUST be very expensive. And we, who want to see Linux working on phones, must invest on it. Otherwise any company trying it will go bankrupt.

There are few of us, it's a massive undertaking. Those of us who can must invest on it. Put our money where our mouth is. It's sad, but the world runs on money. Linux was successful because massive companies profited from it and needed it. If Linux relied solely on donations do you think an average person could use a Linux desktop today?

And then there are those saying "it's stupid to start from scratch". Jolla didn't start from scratch. They came from Nokia and have been building SailfishOS for more than 10 years. There's a lot of work already done to be ignored.

And on top of it, it's not an american company. So no PRISM and other things on it. Specially with the orange king, it's a massive plus to have software free from their system, unlike AOSP, which can just forbid their use by any country the orange king doesn't like.

So, why is it not an option? And those currently using it, what's your experience? Those who bought Xperia and installed on it, how did it go?

TL;DR: Sailfish wasn't ideal before, but with google's dick move, that will be better than not having open source apps.

A phone system will be very expensive and we must pay the entry price to support it, if that's the reason people don't like Jolla.

Jolla has been on the market for a while and already did a lot of work. SailfishOS is not something from scratch, if that's the reason.

Anyone using it currently, how has the experience been for you?

EDIT: I forgot to mention. Bank apps, Facebook stuff and other massive companies apps probably won't work on Linux, nor degoogled phones, and never will. They are allergic to freedom and if you need them, an alternative OS is not for you. Just like Adobe never worked on Linux and probably never will. It's not profitable enough. If that's what you need, just accept google decisions because you don't have a choice. This post is not for that audience.

Links from A_norny_mousse that I missed:

https://sailfishos.org/
company: https://jolla.com/
download: https://shop.jolla.com/ => Get free trial (yes it requires an account, but there’s no timebomb in the trial)
docs: https://docs.sailfishos.org/ (thanks to the community!)
forums: https://forum.sailfishos.org/
[–] guismo@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the information. It confirms my impression that my dream is impossible.

I wanted to build my own house myself, which is a massive challenge. But the idea that it will be made twice as difficult because of other people, not the challenge itself, made me give it up. I wouldn't have the emotional stability to tolerate that.

I'm not a fucking corporation wanting to profit from other people's work. I just want a place to live! I fully support all possible regulations and fees scaling with the intended profit and people hired, but how come someone wanting to get a place to live have to put up with the same as someone wanting profit? Or worse, usually even more, since parasites have many ways of avoiding tax and other things...

And the price of land is a consequence of the same issue: that the market is made for "investors", vampires, undead and other horrors.

The rest, septic tanks, solar system, etc, they are just natural parts of the challenge. Nothing to complain on that, quite the opposite; how easy it is now to generate your own energy with solar is a great show of progress. There will be costs with that, or with linking to the structure someone else paid and provided.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

-And I’ve heard people say Anzac day is dumb for glorifying war.

I say that. And I say people can do whatever they want on this day if they don't think it means anything good. And those who like it do what ever they think they are supposed to do.

But my sure here this is a "dumb opinion".

-1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by guismo@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
 

Final edit: Sorry guys, this got out of hand as I feared and it would take too long to answer everything properly and it would just offend more people.

I got some nice tips for finding places and learned more about Australian's views on the subject. I should have been more careful with what I said. It changed my opinion somewhat but people here would still not like it, so I'll keep it to myself.

Thanks for the very civilized and nice answers and I'm sorry if I didn't answer. I would like to, but in private, or this could become a witch hunt. I do not wish to offend anyone or be attacked because of that. As someone commented, I am the problem here.


Hi everyone, I’ve been lurking for a long time and decided to try to ask something I can’t find out.

First, please be tolerant about the question. I am an Australian citizen, but from a foreign background, so cultural things that seem sacred and unquestionable here are not the same to me. I wouldn’t be crazy to post this on reddit (though I deleted my account ages ago) because I know all the posts would just be attacking me (if you don’t like it, leave, are you defending terrorists?, and so on), instead of helpful comments. Hopefully it will be different here.

The question is: is there any Australian town free from military worship? I mean monuments everywhere, pools and parks named after it and so on. Somewhere I can forget and pretend that this is not how the rest of Australia is.

I’ve been traveling around trying to find a place I would like to settle. I found many small towns I liked, but it seems that the smaller the town, the higher the military worship. They may not even have a public toilet, but they will have a military worship statue that seemed to have cost more than all the town to build.

I love Australia, specially the outback, but the military worship issue is so big that makes me think of looking for another country. I know my taxes are being used to send people to kill whoever the US doesn’t like, and the country prides itself with this history. But if I can ignore that, I can pretend to myself that it’s not true and live happy. I tried to fight the issue for a long time but it makes no difference except to me, sacrificing my well being for nothing. But if I keep being reminded every time I go to do groceries trough the park “invasion of foreign country divine pride park”, it will be impossible. I already try to avoid news and ABC, so it should be possible.

I’m sending a picture of some of the places I’ve been to, without much luck. Funny enough, the town I liked the most, Roma, is the worst, with military trees every 10 meters.

Anyway, that’s it. Maybe I’ll get downvoted to oblivion, but let’s try…

By the way, I don’t know if I am posting this correctly, on the right place and everything. It’s my first lemmy post as well. It's very confusing to know the community to post. It shows everything everwhere!

Edit- I posted this before, thought it was in the wrong place, deleted and posted again. Now I see 2 of the posts and the deleted one has 2 upvotes. This is so confusing...

Edit2 - Before I get any comment, I dislike military worship from any country, not just Australia. Military may or not be necessary in modern societies, but worship and praise should never be acceptable and is specially dangerous when applied to a group with power. Citizens should always be skeptical of their military group, its uses, powers and permissions. It should be like owning a gun. You may be allowed to have one but should be constantly proving you are not doing anything wrong with it. The definition of what is "wrong" or "right" should be constantly questioned as well.

Edit3 - just a reminder, that I do not wish to change anyone's point of view. It's your tradition and culture and I respect, but I don't have to like it and I would like to figure out how to avoid it. It is all. I would like to stop Australian involvment in American wars, but besides that I don't mind if Australians like military or not, but I would like to avoid being exposed to that, assuming that is possible, which is the reason for the post, so I can find out.

view more: next ›