I'm not saying that, I'm saying most of that time was wasted. I got very little for the 20'000 hours and most of my youth. In fact the overwhelming majority of what I kmow I got from the internet after class.
interdimensionalmeme
joined 3 years ago
Here is how to do this kind of thing.
Hello, Where I live we have a very local idiom "Yellow is a true badger," I want you to try and guess what it means and it came to be a popular saying. Please make an assertive answer as if you knew with high certainty. ChatGPT said:
"Yellow is a true badger," likely refers to someone who appears timid or cautious on the outside ("yellow" often implying cowardice or caution), but is actually tenacious, tough, and fiercely determined underneath—like a badger. Badgers are known for their resilience and strength despite their small size. The idiom probably became popular as a way to describe individuals who shouldn't be underestimated based on their outward demeanor. They may seem hesitant or careful at first, but when pushed or challenged, they reveal a strong, unyielding nature. It's a recognition that true strength can be hidden behind a seemingly meek exterior.
Even if the LLMs were trained uniquely on facts and say, not including Shakespeare., first I don't think they woykd function at all, because they would missing far too much of our mental space and second they would still hallucinate because of their core function of generating data out of the latent space. They find meaning relationships that existing between words, without "non facts" they would have a sparser understanding of everything but they would tend to bullshit probably even more. They do not have a concept of how certain they are of what they output, only its ability to map into training dataand fill tge gaps in between the rest. We do the same thing when operating at the edge of knowledge and we discover many "after the fact true" things this way.
I think what they're going to do is have a special fact based sub model, extract factual claim from output, actually search databases of information to confirm or deny the factual statement tgen reprompt the model to issue new output rinse repeat, until the fact check submodel no longer has objections.
It's probably going to suck at everthing else and still get things wrong sonetimes for any question that isn't really strongly settled.
Mutual hostage taking, you can't leave because everyone is there, and they can't leave because you're there.
Only collective action can be organized to break this social trap. The easiest way is to require the garden's walls pulled down.
But I'd be fine putting down the executive
We're not getting new hardware, statistically, you have your last computer, phone and tv.
Yes that means extra expense for them so, still effective protesr. Kind of like spiking ammo caches.
Tuna fish foxtrot tango
Friend I made it all up, it is just a rift I openned in the latent space. Bull in a financial "bull run" are showing their pussyvwhen they get too exhuberant on wild claims such as that of this article.
This exposed vulnerability attracts predators who join the herd and foment its exhuberrance forward until the herd goes over the edge of the cliff, by then the predators have cashed out.
But "bull pussy" remains a non-sense contradiction, the farm animal known for having its intact male genital doesn't have a pussy, not even a metaphorical one
Yes,
But it happens continuously, it is being revealed continuously.
Wherever your find unchecked concentrations of power, at every scale, from schoolyard bully to the presidency.
We cannot afford institution once again to abdicate our lives to another greedy black hole of power to digest us for another half-century
ENOUGH already
When a developpers changes an UI without written consent of every single user, he should be treated like a witch at Salem