morphballganon

Lots of "how dare they solve a real problem with the only method yet invented" in these replies. Gtfo losers, clutch your pearls harder. If you don't like Bluesky don't use it. Don't be a whiny little bitch about it.

What could go wrong

"There are some bad actors on this platform, thus we should completely write it off" ok buddy

I said the end goal in my top level comment. I didn't go into methodology because I figured someone else could do it more eloquently; thank you for doing so.

I haven't watched that one yet. So it's worse? ●︿●

Goro Miyazaki directed Tales From Earthsea. When you look at how bad that movie is, it makes sense that he wouldn't see AI movies as inherently problematic; they'll be similar in quality to his own work.

That would solve the anonymity problem but not the "obscure when requests are duplicates" problem

A browser extension that limits webpages to default Windows fonts only would eliminate that factor from contributing to identification without flagging it as suspicious. A slightly more robust version could frequently cycle between multiple subsets of default Windows fonts. Say Windows comes with 100 fonts. So you could have thousands of configurations with different subsets of those.

Sounds like a solvable problem

Good start. Now make a version that clicks each ad a random number of times from randomly generated IP addresses.

Money and malice are not a dichotomy. I would say most malice is for monetary reasons.

not a lot of people actually use the "safely remove hardware" option

Capitulating to the lowest common denominator, what else is new