pohart

joined 2 years ago
[–] pohart@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've only ever heard of this in a generic sense. I've never seen evidence of a specific case. I don't think it's real

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

My first thought.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I don't doubt that the trades are complicated,, but I have no gauge for how effective trade schools are for trades. I have reason to be skeptical of trade schools for computer programmers.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The grads coming from less rigorous 4 year programs are already lacking. Computer programming is complex enough that I would be very reluctant to learn from a trade school that took less than four years.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago

I believe that our eyesight is worse than it's been historically. Sunlight shows eye growth and we get less of it today than 1000 years ago.

It didn't really change the point we can be mostly somewhat valuable, but there may be more if it's with worse eyesight today.

 

If we had evolved around a red dwarf, would red be our white? And we'd have primary colors that make up red?

[–] pohart@programming.dev 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's soft power for the country, he doesn't care what happens to the country

[–] pohart@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not just the camera, it's the geometry. A car can fit into a narrower space from a narrower lane backing in.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 0 points 7 months ago

If you're views diverge sharply from the mainstream, you're radical.

If you think we should change society to bring about gender equality, you are radical. If you think it society is good with some small tweaks like legislating parity of pay or a certain number of women in c-suite positions, you're a liberal feminist.

Afaict most supposed terfs are actually either non feminist conservatives or liberal feminists.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah my kids are mostly kids when I talk about them

[–] pohart@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

Nazi Germany was the template, so there can be no answer more right than this that isn't based on Nazi Germany.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (33 children)

You're absolutely right, but haven't I read that they're learning to lie about their presence in the manophere? So if it's, say 10% who actively think and act that way, plus 15% passively subject themselves to it without going all in, but who aren't really judging, that's 1/4 guys who I wouldn't risk a relationship with, many of whom are actively hiding their positions. I can see why it wouldn't be worth it to date any man. Especially for someone with her experiences.

And my IRL impression is that it's way more guys than 15% who intentionally expose themselves to it, and slightly more than 10% who fully buy into the misogyny.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Is the jet going even if you don't, with the same other passengers?

view more: next ›