this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
125 points (95.6% liked)

World News

50432 readers
2513 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kirill Dmitriev first posted about the idea on Thursday, suggesting a "Putin-Trump" rail tunnel could connect the two countries under the Bering Strait, which separates Russia's vast and sparsely populated Chukotka region from Alaska.

Asked about the idea during a press conference with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday, Donald Trump called it "interesting".

He also asked President Zelenskyy what he made of it, to which Mr Zelenskyy replied: "I'm not happy with this idea."

This prompted laughter from the US side.

Overnight, Mr Dmitriev posted on X, saying: "We have started the feasibility study of the Russia-Alaska tunnel six months ago.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Michal@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Are they trying to retake Alaska and have US pay for the tunnel?

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Literally just drew a line in MS Paint. The kind of idea a 5 year old would come up with if someone asked them to come up with the dumbest idea they can think of.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 128 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There's already a tunnel connecting Russia to the US. It's Donald's asshole.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The ring of fire.... the ring of fire

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Fed by big macs and steaming hot fries!

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Tssssssssss

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 64 points 3 days ago (4 children)

From a Canadian point of view, seeing as there is no direct route to the lower 48 without going through Canadian sovereign land, this seems like nothing more than another way to force Canada into becoming the 51st state.

Fuck Putin and Trump.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Has anybody asked Alaskans if they'd like to be Canadian? I would jump at the chance right now if I was them.

[–] Neps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

I lived in Alaska for a while and despite the state being a bit more conservative, most people I knew there had a pretty favorable opinion of Canada. I'd say they would like it.

[–] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

Fascism at its finest, fuck em both

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Actually, back when this was originally thought up 20+ years ago, there was a more expensive version with another sea tunnel between Washington and Alaska.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It's all part of the same scheme, and also connected to why they're pro-climate-change.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A long, suboceanic tunnel close to the Ring of Fire. I wonder what might go wrong with that.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago

Like he hasn't wasted enough tax money on stupid ideas.

[–] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

But the high speed rail is too expensive, eh?-This is just another distraction from the Epstein Files, but even if they really did try to go through with this, it will go about as far as he got with the idea of building a wall

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Permafrost and tectonic plates are why this hasn’t happened. That, and its connecting the ass end most remote portions of both countries. With current rail transit times, it would take weeks.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's literally no existing roads anywhere near the Russian end. Rail probably comes closer (because this is Russia), but it's basically as remote as you can get.

One day connecting the continents there seems like it could make sense. In the short term, lol no.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

America is already working on solving that permafrost problem.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

So is Russia.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Haha but also, 2 week distraction is all the orange bastard needs

[–] socsa@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What you don't want to see the US and Russia pooping back and forth forever?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

There have been some credible studies about this, exploring both a bridge and a tunnel, and the cost of the infrastructure to and from the bridge was many times the cost of the actual crossing.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

This would be the most ambitious engineering feat in human history. A project to rival colonization of Mars in expense and danger. All to connect one wilderness to another. Brilliant.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Tread on us harder daddy Putin

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A brilliant idea. Open a route for Russia to send a population through, which Russia will need to save from US persecution. The subsequent 3 day special military operation will have nothing to do with returning Alaska to russian control.

[–] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

My first thought.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Isn't that territory permafrosted? That'd make a construction project of that scale a non-starter. Plus a whole bunch of other reasons it'd be dumb.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Russians have had rail in Siberia forever.

This was planned out 20+ years ago for cars and rail there just wasn't ever the political will to do it.

It makes sense geographically. Not as much geopolitically.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And a fuckton of people died building it.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Died? It's a plan on paper. No one ever built anything. And in 2025 it would be pretty low risk, TBMs are commonplace and we have drones.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

That's how Russia does everything. Throw bodies at it. Not really an engineering necessity.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Won't be for long.