Yeah, because he knew that thing probably wasn't gonna stop. Why destroy the car when you don't have to? Concrete wouldn't have changed the outcome.
samus12345
joined 2 years ago
Interesting, thanks for the explanation! That is a tricky one to translate into English.
loosely translated because of idioms
Out of curiosity, what's the literal translation?
No, 21% struggle with basic literacy skills. They're illiterate, but not fully illiterate.
No. People think things that aren't smarter than them are all the time.
criminal acts
With this definition, a government can do anything it wants without it being terrorism because it gets to decide what's criminal. So while it may be terrorism by definition, that definition is pretty useless without a lot of context.
What's her problem?
I'd be surprised if he did. He sees Teslas as an extension of himself. Which is why it's so very effective at upsetting him whenever people do stuff like this.
The cars suck, but he's right that the company hasn't done anything to deserve this. He's the one who chose to make himself the face of Tesla, though, so however people feel about him, they'll feel about any business he owns.
Terrorism, though? Hardly. It's protest. He's the one doing terrorism by dismantling the government.
Oh, you're a "both sides are the same" person.
Genocide is against international law, too.
Yes, and our law enforcement has more of bigger and better ones.